Do we need the suppression in JavaSoundAudioClip.java as I could not
find any mention of Applet in that class?
In AppletViewer.java
shouldn't we need to add "deprecation" to
45 @SuppressWarnings("serial") // JDK implementation class Do we still need this
160
On 02.11.2016 19:23, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 02.11.16 9:43, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
The path is not printed because there always several paths to look for
the system module.
But I did not get how filesystem read permission is related to the
console output.
This is not a console output this
On 20.10.16 1:14, Philip Race wrote:
Well maybe but this isn't about adding deprecations it is just
about of getting rid of warnings for uses of APIs that are
already deprecated.
ok.
You are welcome to file a separate bug on that ...
-phil.
On 10/19/16, 2:59 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On
On 02.11.16 9:43, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
The path is not printed because there always several paths to look for
the system module.
But I did not get how filesystem read permission is related to the
console output.
This is not a console output this is an exception which can be handled.
Really?
On 11/1/2016 10:57 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 05.10.16 10:35, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Can you clarify, what does it mean "wrong", this why we cannot use it
or what? If it is wrong then we can fix it, if it is correct why we
cannot use it? It should be the same as getNativeScale(), because it
On 11/1/2016 10:37 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 28.10.16 11:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
probably it is possible to change the while loop to something? just to
hide the usage of Enumeration? like
Enumiration.asIterator().forEachRemaining()?
I did not get why. What is wrong with Enumeration?
On 11/1/2016 10:44 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 28.10.16 12:35, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Probably this clipping should be done in the
633 paintText(ss, g, tabPlacement, font, metrics,
634 tabIndex, clippedTitle, textRect, isSelected);
?
It should be designed
+1
--Semyon
On 11/1/2016 5:13 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Looks fine.
On 01.11.16 16:47, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
Hello,
Could you review the fix:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168992
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8168992/webrev.00
The fix
On 10/28/2016 10:47 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 28.10.16 12:56, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
If we unsure what information will be contained in the message is it
necessary to provide it to the user? Or it will be enough to describe
the problem in general? For example this message should not
