Re: AW: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Edoardo Martelli
Hi Mike Preferably it should run on windows (we're just not at home on the *nix platforms), have all it's config options in a sql database, provide anti-spam and anti-virus out of the box, have a feature-rich webmail client and be tailored for a small ISP. Our specs: ~700 Domains, ~4000

Re: AW: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Andre Oppermann
Edoardo Martelli wrote: Hi Mike Preferably it should run on windows (we're just not at home on the *nix platforms), have all it's config options in a sql database, provide anti-spam and anti-virus out of the box, have a feature-rich webmail client and be tailored for a small ISP. Our specs:

Re: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Roger Buchwalder
Hi Mike Between 2000 and 2004 my ISP used IMail. It was very easy to use, also those plugin against spam and virus was very nice. (till then, i don't know the linux-style aka spamassassin etc.) Some of these plugins created the same person, who made dnsstuff.com One of those guys is R. Scott

Re: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Lukas Beeler
Hi, While i agree with all your points above, and don't think that Exchange is the right product for a plain ISP-Mail setup, it isn't as bad as you're trying to make it. * Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: That's the problem. When an exchange server goes bad you're offline for a couple of