Jeroen Massar wrote: >> dns was not really questioned, but I would prefer djbdns >> (+patches, again) or bind. > > Patches, patches, patches. Bind9 is fine (and actually what I usually > use) but pdns&nds are simply faster, thus for scalability I would go for > those, then again it depends on ones needs.
Given the potentially high DNS traffic (all those xBL lookups), a dedicated caching DNS resolver may make sense. Additionally, you should consider running a local rbldnsd for mirrored zones (proxying from the resolver to rbldnsd). >>> - amavis + clamav & Spamassassin using milter inline in postfix >> Seem both to be just 'the standard antivir and antispam' solution > > There is afaik nothing better, especially in combo with: Detection rates of ClamAV are pretty low. If you want to advertise "virus protection" as a feature, you may want to integrate at least one additional scanner. -- Matthias -- http://www.dnswl.org/ - Protect against false positives _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
