hi all
sorry, i'm quite late and reservation deadline is friday ,-(
but next monday is the next planned beer event (just aside TIX) ,-)
the facts for the next event:
-
Date: 19th of February 2007
Time: starting around 18.30 o'clock
Location: @ the Don Weber
Hoi!
| sorry, i'm quite late and reservation deadline is friday ,-(
| but next monday is the next planned beer event (just aside TIX) ,-)
I'm in transit from NL to CH on that date - as a new comer (I came
through AS8954, then AS12859, and started at AS15169 last August) I've
sort of gotten out
Hi Maillist,
SPF is starting to become a topic at our company again - ^^ - and I'm
now interested:
- who does not use SPF
- who implemented SPF DNS entries
- who uses SPF for matching
- who fully uses SPF ^^ lolz
I'm just trying to get a general feeling again about what the
community thinks
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:35:03PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Maillist,
SPF is starting to become a topic at our company again - ^^ - and I'm
now interested:
- who does not use SPF
- who implemented SPF DNS entries
- who uses SPF for matching
- who fully uses SPF ^^ lolz
I'm
we're not using spf at all.
i think there's every year a new discussion about it. check out the
archive ;-)
-steven
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 3:35 PM
To: swinog@swinog.ch
Hello Bernard
That would be a nice solution, but explain that to a user...
cheers
rog
Bernard Dugas schrieb:
Bonjour,
Norbert Bollow wrote:
Use DomainKeys instead of SPF. DomainKeys serves the same purpose,
but doesn't share the fundamental brokenness of SPF.
And why not using the
And why not using the existing authentication protocol on outgoing smtp
server ? So the sender can use the smtp server of the provider of its
email address from any network and SPF can work without any problem.
How would this solve the forwarding problem?
And how are you going to teach
Nowadays, every sicko can buy a .com domain for 9$ or even less.
Spammers buy domains, put correct SPF records in their zonefiles and
throw the domain away afterwards... (just like you did with hotmail
accounts a few years back :-))
So IMHO DNS based spam fighting doesn't work. At least not
Roger Buchwalder wrote:
That would be a nice solution, but explain that to a user...
We did it, and that was fine as they are only 2 boxes to click on
outlook/outlookexpress, and still easy enough on mozilla/thunderbird
with more mature users :-)
All are very happy as they don't have to
Viktor Steinmann wrote:
Nowadays, every sicko can buy a .com domain for 9$ or even less.
Spammers buy domains, put correct SPF records in their zonefiles and
throw the domain away afterwards... (just like you did with hotmail
accounts a few years back :-))
Sure, but at least, I know that no
On Wednesday 14. February 2007 22:15, Bernard Dugas wrote:
Adrian Ulrich wrote:
And why not using the existing authentication protocol on
outgoing smtp server ? So the sender can use the smtp
server of the provider of its email address from any
network and SPF can work without any problem.
11 matches
Mail list logo
