Re: [swinog] spamhaus.org

2007-06-22 Diskussionsfäden Tobias Goeller
Hello, Adrian Ulrich wrote: > Hi Tobias, > >> I've stopped using spamhaus.org when they started blocking 127.0.0.1 > > Didn't notice this and currently it is not listed. You're right. It's no longer listed. I took the list out more than a year ago. > Do you have any 'evidence' (or references)

Re: [swinog] spamhaus.org

2007-06-22 Diskussionsfäden Roger Buchwalder
Hi all I don't unterstand, why someone should trust any Blacklist/Spamlist/whatelse and delete some mail, who may probably hit one of thouse lists. _Never_ /dev/null any mail, only weighting them, and if the wieght is much, then move it to a spamfolder on the recipients maildir. [a] I don't u

Re: [swinog] spamhaus.org

2007-06-22 Diskussionsfäden Adrian Ulrich
Hi Tobias, > I've stopped using spamhaus.org when they started blocking 127.0.0.1 Didn't notice this and currently it is not listed. Do you have any 'evidence' (or references) ;-) (Mailing-list postings, etc) > (what a very nice idea if you have a system that sends logs... very clever). IMO t

Re: [swinog] spamhaus.org (Ich bin abwesend ...)

2007-06-22 Diskussionsfäden Markus Schlup
.. von Montag, 25. Juni 2007 bis Freitag 6. Juli 2007. Bei dringenden Fragen oder Problemen wenden Sie sich bitte an meinen Stellvertreter, Herrn Christoph Aeschbacher (061 264 1689). Freundliche GrĂ¼sse, Markus Schlup Confidentiality Notice This email and any files transmitted with it are confid

Re: [swinog] spamhaus.org

2007-06-22 Diskussionsfäden Adrian Ulrich
> Is there someone left who uses them to reject mails on smtp level? Yes, we are still using Spamhaus.org on our MX servers, but we are using the rsync feed and we are able to whitelist IPs within a few seconds. Anyway: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL55483 is still there but

Re: [swinog] spamhaus.org

2007-06-22 Diskussionsfäden Tobias Goeller
well, it's about a very efficient way for spamhaus to decrease their traffic... because they'll be obsolete within a short amount of time (DNSBL providers behaving that way can't be considered professionals and therefor can't be used for productive systems). I've stopped using spamhaus.org when t

Re: [swinog] spamhaus.org

2007-06-22 Diskussionsfäden Matthias Hertzog
[1] = Bullshit [2] = No, we don't use ugly/useless/badly-maintained things like that. nic.at hat a "discussion" with them this week. Spamhaus listed their mailservers. What a "great" idea, to blacklist a registry. :-( Best wishes, Matthias _ mhs @ inte

[swinog] spamhaus.org

2007-06-22 Diskussionsfäden Andreas Anderson
Hi Guys. any opinions on the game [1] that spamhaus.org is playing? Is there someone left who uses them to reject mails on smtp level? Regards, Andreas [1] http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/91587 _ Live Search delivers