Hello,
Till now we haven't receive any letter. Our Partnernetwork hasn't to
receive any letter.
It is nice. I think they must wirte to all providers...
We have more than 3000 clients together...
Greetings
X. Aerni
_
Von: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch
I fully agree with this statement, reason why I was pointing out that a
lawyer opinion would be welcome.
I'm pretty sure that every people reading this topic on SwiNOG is not sure
that such a request is fully supported by a law.
Now, I am not sure that some customers will recourse because one
a lot of them are getting the feed from cablecom allready filtered i think.
Roger
I have the problem with this (sorry i must say) of the swiss romande... The
most blocking of pages
are the same law on the blocking page. I don't sure if a voud law could send
this letter to an ISP in
No, the most have local peerings.And feed from Swisscom or div. Providers.
Some of the little Providers has a CC Feed.
I know 4 Cableprovider they make the Internet self.
Greetings Xaver
- Original Message -
From: ro...@mgz.ch
To: Xaver Aerni xae...@pop.ch; swi...@swinog.ch
Sent:
You're assuming that the biggest ISPs will apply the filtering at the
entrance of their network, which is not necesseraly true. They can also
decide to filter closer to their access equipments. This would mean that
peerings with other ISPs or BGP-tiered enterprises would be unfiltered.
Depending
When the ISP block it only by DNS Filtering???
I think to block 1 side is a DNS Filtering the easyest and fastest way.
Greetings
Xaver
- Original Message -
From: Yann Gauteron
To: swi...@swinog.ch
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [swinog] Post from Canton
DNS filtering is also the solution that is the easiest to go around... :-)
Either chose a foreign DNS, or chose to fully resolve the names by
yourself...
But I'm sure this is the easiest and cheapest way to proceed.
2009/2/17 Xaver Aerni xae...@pop.ch
When the ISP block it only by DNS
this is not the right way to block access to a site as i can setup my own dns
or use foreign nameservers
but what is the best method? blocking ip traffic to the site can also mean to
block legitimate traffic to a shared hosting server!?
cheers
oliver
On Feb 17, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Xaver Aerni
Xaver Aerni wrote:
IP Block is the Problem, you are Blocking more sites as the to block...
I think a Server has 100 Sites if you block the IP all 100 Sites are
blocked. You have a big Problem you must block a Site Xy and the UBS.Com
or an other bigger Firm is on the same server.
In other
Oliver Bollisger schrieb:
but what is the best method? blocking ip traffic to the site can also
mean to block legitimate traffic to a shared hosting server!?
Filter the traffic for specific IPs/networks/etc (eg by playing some BGP
games) through transparent proxies and redirect forbidden
silvan
they've presented the product on swinog last time:
http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog17/20081022_SWINOG.pdf
-steven
_
From: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch]
On Behalf Of Silvan Michael Gebhardt
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:56 PM
11 matches
Mail list logo
