* on the Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:36:35AM +0100, Thomas Dagonnier wrote:
It may be an idea to have a look at the treaty they have to implement
: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/185.htm
I concur, this treaty is shite. It criminalizes various tools instead
of acts, tries to
Peter Keel seeg...@discordia.ch wrote:
* on the Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:36:35AM +0100, Thomas Dagonnier wrote:
It may be an idea to have a look at the treaty they have to implement
: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/185.htm
Shame on whoever came up with this, and on
* on the Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:15:53PM +0100, Norbert Bollow wrote:
* on the Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:36:35AM +0100, Thomas Dagonnier wrote:
It may be an idea to have a look at the treaty they have to implement
: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/185.htm
Shame on
Copyright infringement IS already a criminal offence (Art. 67 URG -
Bundesgesetz über das Urheberrecht) - nothing new there.
Regards,
Christa
Von: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch im Auftrag von Peter Keel
Gesendet: Mi 18.03.2009 13:41
An: swi...@swinog.ch
Andreas Fink af...@list.fink.org 2009-03-17:
Collegues,
The federal adminstration wants to change the law about cyber crime.
See also:
http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/gg/pc/pendent.html#EJPD
(or especially Genehmigung und Umsetzung des Übereinkommens des
Europarates über die
I have a suggestion: I could draft a comment (regarding hacking-tools) for
the Vernehmlassung and submit it to the mailing-list for approval and input by
SWINOG members. As the author of a doctoral thesis on Art. 143bis (the Swiss
hacking provision), I might be able to add a certain academic
Hi Christa
(do you have any decision procedures?)
I guess that the only decission would be, who pays you the beer/drink/prosecco
or whatever.
;-)
Cheers
Günti
From: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch] On
Behalf Of Christa
Hi Christa
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Christa Pfister wrote:
[..]
I would be prepared to do this for free, it wouldn't be a paid
Gutachten, but rather a joint statement by an association of
people who deal with this issues on a daily basis and a lawyer
who has studied this provision in
Christa Pfister m...@c-pfister.ch wrote:
One important thing to keep in mind is that signatures under
international treaties are *not* a commitment to do what the
treaty says, they are only a declaration of intention to consider for
ratification that particular version of the treaty. That's
9 matches
Mail list logo
