Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Studer
Thanks Bernd. As you perhaps has seen, we are now thinking about a 3825 or 7201. We think both will do the job, but the 7201 will have more power. Kind Regards Patrick ** X-NetConsulting GmbH Internet

Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Studer
Ciao Thomas Besten Dank für den Input. Im Moment haben wir den 7201 oder den 3825 in die nähere Auswahl einbezogen. So wie wir das sehen ist der 7201 ja ein 720x mit NPE-G2 (einfach halt nur mit 1 Slot statt mit 4 oder 6), was ja dann vermutlich für die nächsten Zeit reichen sollte. Oder sehen wi

Re: [swinog] Multihomed project

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Alexandre Egger
Hi Patrick, The Cisco's 7201 works perfectly as CPE, they support most protocol and are even a bit evolutive. As your budget is a limitation, one option is to get a 7201 from the official market, so with all guarantees and support you need from Cisco and your reseller and grab a second one from t

Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Studer
Ciao Reto Wir werden vermutlich in einem Datacenter in Basel starten. Aber danke für den Hinweis. Grüsse Patrick ** X-NetConsulting GmbH Internet http://www.x-netconsulting.ch Grosspeterstrasse 21

Re: [swinog] Multihomed project

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Studer
Hi Alexandre Thanks for your suggestion. The solution with a 7201 looks very interesting and since one 7201 is near of the price of two 3825, that could be perhaps the solutions for which we should go. The only thing is, that with two separate boxes, we are better covered in the case of hardware f

Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Studer
Thanks for the link to the Router performance sheet. Do you see perhaps also some impacts about the new as-numbers or ipv6 for any of the smaller solutions (28xx, 38xx)? Regards Patrick ** X-NetConsulting GmbH

Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Studer
Hallo Viktor Wie wäre denn Deine Empfehlung. Etwas grösseres ist etwas unklar ;-). Grüsse Patrick ** X-NetConsulting GmbH Internet http://www.x-netconsulting.ch Grosspeterstrasse 21 E-M

Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Paolo Lucente
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:42:51AM +0200, Bernd SPIESS wrote: > you have to basicaly decide if you want a cpu driven box (28*, 38*, > NPE-G1/G2) or a hardware > driven box (sup32, sup720, c-120**) > in the first case you have to primary look for the cpu performance - in the > second case you ha

Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Bernd SPIESS
see here: http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf 3725 = 179 mbit 3745 = 256 mbit (best case calculated with 64 byte paket size) you have to basicaly decide if you want a cpu driven box (28*, 38*, NPE-G1/G2) or a hardware driven box (sup32, su

Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Studer
Hi Peter Thanks for the input (incl. the hint for Kingston, which we already know ;-)). Depending, on what we get form other as suggestion, we think that we will start with a 28xx or 38xx router. Kind Regards Patrick

Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Studer
Hi Pascale That's an answer I was looking for. Some more questions. Why you suggest the SP Service IOS? What's about the 3825/45 Series? Would that be the "golden middle way"? Will this box give us a little more capacity, so there is little bit of air for the router, or is the only way to go for

Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Pascal Gloor
Hi Patrick, The first step will be, to have 10 Mbit/s fixed or 100 Mbit/s burstable service with an additional link to SwissIX where we want to do some privat peerings. In a second step, we will add a second or a third upstream with about the same speeds as the first connection. All conn

Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Studer
Hallo Matthias Das steht noch nicht fest. Wir planen aber unsere RZ in ein externes Datacenter auszulagern, welches die benötigten Anbindungen zu anderen ISPs für Upstream und den Zugang zu SwissIX bietet. Grüsse Patrick **

Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Studer
Hi We prefer to have a Cisco box, since we have about 15 years of cisco experience. Kind Regards Patrick ** X-NetConsulting GmbH Internet http://www.x-netconsulting.ch Grosspeterstrasse 21

Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Studer
If possible, it would be nice to survive a ddos ;-) That the 256 MB isn't enough is clear. Because of this we asked, if it will be enough just to upgrade to 768 MB to hold a full routing table or not. Or to ask the question direct, what is the minimum memory requirements to hold a full routing tab

[swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements

2009-09-17 Diskussionsfäden studer . patrick
Hi We are planning to go multihomed with our infrastructure. The first step will be, to have 10 Mbit/s fixed or 100 Mbit/s burstable service with an additional link to SwissIX where we want to do some privat peerings. In a second step, we will add a second or a third upstream with about the sa