Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

Dear Serge On 11/11/2010 08:22 AM, Serge Droz wrote: From different third parties we receive a fairly large number of URLs in .ch/.li ccTLDs which distribute malware. We're talking a few hundred URLs per week. In a first step SWITCH verifies that this claim is true. On the first glance, this

Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

On 11.11.2010 09:01, Daniel Kamm wrote: Dear Serge On 11/11/2010 08:22 AM, Serge Droz wrote: From different third parties we receive a fairly large number of URLs in .ch/.li ccTLDs which distribute malware. We're talking a few hundred URLs per week. In a first step SWITCH verifies that this

Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

Hello Serge, hello all without Serge, On Thursday 11 November 2010 08:22:53 Serge Droz wrote: On 25 November 2010 SWITCH will launch an new initiative to maintain the high security standards of Swiss websites. Let me briefly explain what we will do, as it is relevant to the SWINOG

Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

Hi Andre You did mention AEFV SR784.104. Art 14bis requires Switch to do this: Die Registerbetreiberin muss einen Domain-Namen blockieren und die diesbezügliche Zuweisung zu einem Namenserver aufheben: a. wenn der begründete Verdacht besteht, dass dieser Domain-Name benutzt wird: 1. um mit

Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

Hello Im Auftrag von Andre Oppermann Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. November 2010 09:55 On 11.11.2010 09:01, Daniel Kamm wrote: Dear Serge On 11/11/2010 08:22 AM, Serge Droz wrote: On the first glance, this seems to be a neat thing. But then again, who decides if 'something' is considered

Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

Im Auftrag von Martin Jaggi Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. November 2010 11:01 You did mention AEFV SR784.104. Art 14bis requires Switch to do this: Die Registerbetreiberin muss einen Domain-Namen blockieren und die diesbezügliche Zuweisung zu einem Namenserver aufheben: a. wenn der

Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

Hi Serge, Gotta agree with Olivier, Andre Mike. This is a strange decision and a strange process (2 weeks to react to this new world order???). Makes me wonder why such a strange strategy couldn't be extrapolated to where .ch is disconnected unless some subdomain spreading malware stops

Re: [swinog] [Spam] Re: Blocking Malware distribution sites

Aparently legislation managed to already break the system without us noticing. Just noticed this as well... http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/784_104/a14bist.html How do stupid laws like this get through legislation? Don't they ask any technical advisors beforehand? Does anybody know of other

Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

On 11/11/2010 11:01 AM, Martin Jaggi wrote: You did mention AEFV SR784.104. Art 14bis requires Switch to do this: Die Registerbetreiberin muss einen Domain-Namen blockieren und die diesbezügliche Zuweisung zu einem Namenserver aufheben: a. wenn der begründete Verdacht besteht, dass

Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

On Thursday 11 November 2010 11:08:16 mailinglis...@p-guhl.ch wrote: Besides that: How do you make sure (legally) that any of your e-mails really got through? Quite a challenge to send an E-Mail to a domain with non-existent NS and therefor no MX RRs... Or does switch give me a call? Or

Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

On 11.11.2010 11:36, Daniel Kamm wrote: On 11/11/2010 11:01 AM, Martin Jaggi wrote: You did mention AEFV SR784.104. Art 14bis requires Switch to do this: Die Registerbetreiberin muss einen Domain-Namen blockieren und die diesbezügliche Zuweisung zu einem Namenserver aufheben: a. wenn der

Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

On Thursday 11 November 2010 11:08:16 mailinglis...@p-guhl.ch wrote: Besides that: How do you make sure (legally) that any of your e-mails really got through? Quite a challenge to send an E-Mail to a domain with non-existent NS and therefor no MX RRs... Or does switch give me a call? Or

[swinog] Self-care DNS management solution

hi, I'm looking for a solution (standalone software or an outsourced service) with the following requirements: -- Leased-line customers manage PTR records for their IPv4 and IPv6 address blocks -- They also manage A, AAA, and other possible records in their domains -- Northbound system

Re: [swinog] Self-care DNS management solution

typo: of course :) - Original Message From: Stanislav Sinyagin ssinya...@yahoo.com To: swi...@swinog.ch Sent: Thu, November 11, 2010 12:38:48 PM Subject: [swinog] Self-care DNS management solution hi, I'm looking for a solution (standalone software or an outsourced

Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

Am 11.11.2010 um 11:36 schrieb Daniel Kamm: On 11/11/2010 11:01 AM, Martin Jaggi wrote: You did mention AEFV SR784.104. Art 14bis requires Switch to do this: Die Registerbetreiberin muss einen Domain-Namen blockieren und die diesbezügliche Zuweisung zu einem Namenserver aufheben: a.

Re: [swinog] Self-care DNS management solution

actually an outsourced managed service would be preferable. - Original Message From: Stanislav Sinyagin ssinya...@yahoo.com To: swi...@swinog.ch Sent: Thu, November 11, 2010 12:38:48 PM Subject: [swinog] Self-care DNS management solution hi, I'm looking for a solution