Hy List
Does anybody have experience with 6rd capable soho hardware?
Which manufacturer does already support 6rd?
E.g. Fritzbox...
Freundliche Grüsse
Adrian Kägi
System Engineering
Teamleiter
ZAPP AG
Bahnhofstr. 28, 3076 Worb
Telefon +41 31 710 34 23
Fax +41 31 710 34 25
Hi
If you count Cisco 800 Series routers to SOHO hardware … It works with the
latest IOS (15.1(4)M)
I'm currently running it at home[1] via Swisscom VDSL (without issues so far
except some firewall stuff, but nothing serious).
If you're interested I'll share the relevant configuration.
Hi
OK, the Cisco 800 router is a device for power users... :-) But im really
interested about configuration!
Im looking for H/W like Netgear,Linksys and so on...
Netgear cust. support answered with:
Not implemented here... :-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
hi adrian
maybe this helps:
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-surveys
greetings
-steven
-Original Message-
From: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch] On
Behalf Of Adrian Kägi
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 9:58 AM
To: swinog@lists.swinog.ch
On 2011-Jun-06 14:38, Oliver Schad wrote:
Am Monday 06 June 2011 schrieb mir Jeroen Massar:
On 2011-Jun-06 14:17, Oliver Schad wrote:
Am Monday 06 June 2011 schrieb mir Adrian Kägi:
Thx for your replies! Wow!
I see, there are tons of vendors!
But when they support IPv6 or 6to4 IP6 Tunnel and
2011/6/6 Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org:
The fun and joy of 6rd is of course that your IPv6 prefix changes every
time you get a new IPv4 address. With IPv4 and NAT this did not matter
so much to the internal network, but now when your IP address changes
you need to renumber your home network,
On 2011-Jun-06 15:44, Guillaume Leclanche wrote:
2011/6/6 Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org:
The fun and joy of 6rd is of course that your IPv6 prefix changes every
time you get a new IPv4 address. With IPv4 and NAT this did not matter
so much to the internal network, but now when your IP address
Am Monday 06 June 2011 schrieb mir Jeroen Massar:
The only thing where it might not be compatible is the user interface
for making it easy to configure them.
While I agree to your point of view that 6rd and 6to4 are very close to
each other and it shoudln't take much time to implement all
2011/6/6 Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org:
ULA would still require NAT66 if you want those hosts to be able to
communicate to the outside, unless of course you want to firewall your
internal machines based on the global prefix and update those firewall
rules and all other dependencies all the
On 2011-Jun-06 16:18, Guillaume Leclanche wrote:
2011/6/6 Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org:
ULA would still require NAT66 if you want those hosts to be able to
communicate to the outside, unless of course you want to firewall your
internal machines based on the global prefix and update those
Am Monday 06 June 2011 schrieb mir Jeroen Massar:
On 2011-Jun-06 15:55, Oliver Schad wrote:
Am Monday 06 June 2011 schrieb mir Jeroen Massar:
The only thing where it might not be compatible is the user
interface for making it easy to configure them.
While I agree to your point of view
11 matches
Mail list logo
