Salut, Viktor,
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 08:24:52 +0200, Viktor Steinmann wrote:
> - Facebook bashing is hip among the IT community. However on Facebook
> you only share what you want to share and you can even lie about all
> of your personal details, even create a fake personality. If you have
> priv
* on the Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 06:14:18PM +0200, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
> What politicians don't seem (or simply don't want) to understand is that
> the problem of these LI-technology lie in the huge potential for abuse and
> misuse.
> Politicians sometimes seem to live in an ideal world, whe
: swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Subject: Re: [swinog] BÜPF...again ; )
It's a poor world some of the SwiNOG members live in.
- Facebook bashing is hip among the IT community. However on Facebook
you only share what you want to share and you can even lie about all of
your personal details, even cre
> Privacy is something, only old people seem to care about.
I hear that a lot, but it doesn't seem to hold up to scientific scrutiny:
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/study_youth_not_only_care_about_facebook_privacy_t.php
But just continue to claim this; it makes old people feel better.
--
To: swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Subject: Re: [swinog] BÜPF...again ; )
It's a poor world some of the SwiNOG members live in.
- Facebook bashing is hip among the IT community. However on Facebook you only
share what you want to share and you can even lie about all of your personal
details, eve
It's a poor world some of the SwiNOG members live in.
- Facebook bashing is hip among the IT community. However on Facebook
you only share what you want to share and you can even lie about all of
your personal details, even create a fake personality. If you have
privacy concerns, don't put it
Le 20.08.2010 18:14, rai...@ultra-secure.de a écrit :
We probably all followed the discussion in Germany about the
"Bundestrojaner" and how it failed.
And of course, a trojan spying on citizens is a major impact in privacy,
which is not acceptable.
Try to argue about that with people who
> We probably all followed the discussion in Germany about the
> "Bundestrojaner" and how it failed.
>
> And of course, a trojan spying on citizens is a major impact in privacy,
> which is not acceptable.
Try to argue about that with people who have a facebook-account.
Last count: 500 000 000+.
Pr
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:48:10AM +0200, Steven Glogger wrote:
> stony,
> >We probably all followed the discussion in Germany about the
> >"Bundestrojaner" and how it failed.
> >
> >And of course, a trojan spying on citizens is a major impact in
> >privacy, which is not acceptable.
> yes, sounds a
stony,
We probably all followed the discussion in Germany about the
"Bundestrojaner" and how it failed.
And of course, a trojan spying on citizens is a major impact in
privacy, which is not acceptable.
yes, sounds again like a aprils joke.
However I don't think, that it's possible to create
We probably all followed the discussion in Germany about the
"Bundestrojaner" and how it failed.
And of course, a trojan spying on citizens is a major impact in privacy,
which is not acceptable.
However I don't think, that it's possible to create such a trojan and
use it, because of the foll
Am 19.08.2010 22:27, schrieb Pascal Gloor:
I thought I'd say some words for all small and medium sized ISPs while I
had the SDA/ATS journalist on the phone.
in German:
http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/digital/internet/berwachungswahn-der-Beamten-in-Bern/story/12403271
in French: http://www.romandie
Hi SwiNOGers ;-)
I thought I'd say some words for all small and medium sized ISPs while I had
the SDA/ATS journalist on the phone.
in German:
http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/digital/internet/berwachungswahn-der-Beamten-in-Bern/story/12403271
in French:
http://www.romandie.com/infos/news2/2010081818
13 matches
Mail list logo
