Hi SWINOG members,
we're a LIR, we got a /32 from RIPE and we want to allocate /40s and /48s to
customers. Only snag is that the customers will not have their Internet feed
from us but from any Service Provider of their choice. The customers will have
to convince their SPs (X, Y, Z) to route
I'm really not into IPv6, but routing Prefixes from an AS which has no
peering or transit relationship with you has never been a good idea in
the IPv4 world.
I'd be also interested if that's still true in the IPv6 world.
Kind regards,
Viktor
On 27.04.2012 10:09, john.coll...@bit.admin.ch
On 2012-04-27 10:09 , john.coll...@bit.admin.ch wrote:
Hi SWINOG members,
we’re a LIR, we got a /32 from RIPE
You requested a Provider Aggregated (PA) prefix. It is all in the name.
So where did all the /48s come from ... also one or two /40s... ??
Those are Provider Independent
Hoi John,
Interesting situation!
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:09 AM, john.coll...@bit.admin.ch wrote:
Hi SWINOG members,
we’re a LIR, we got a /32 from RIPE and we want to allocate /40s and /48s to
customers. Only snag is that the customers will not have their Internet
feed from us but from
On 27.04.2012 10:09, john.coll...@bit.admin.ch wrote:
Hello,
we’re a LIR, we got a /32 from RIPE and we want to allocate /40s and
/48s to customers. Only snag is that the customers will not have their
Internet feed from us but from any Service Provider of their choice. The
customers will have
Hi John,
In my company we will accept or advertise upto /48, also most of our
upstreams will do the same. As for routing sub-allocations from a different
AS some providers do that some don`t, as you said they will have to be
convinced (but it`s not really good practice for PA space).
Regards,
6 matches
Mail list logo
