Re: AW: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist

2007-11-03 Diskussionsfäden Marco Meile
I don't think that.

If you Pay Money for delisting, you can wait for a while and you are
listed again.
The Problem are the Dynamic IP Subnets. if to much of the Cosumers
Infected with any spambots,
the Subnet got listed again, and if 2 or 3 subnets in a AS are listed,
the whole are got listed...

so, the only way for sunrise i think is create a own AS for all Dynamic
Ranges and one for fixed/business ranges...

Regards

Marco

Xaver Aerni wrote:
 Hello,
 This is the Problem Sunrise won't pay money. And they want make money.
 I think the best way is to removie UCEProtect.net level 3 from your
 Blacklist. 
 Greetings
 Xaver 

   
 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Marco Meile
 Gesendet: Freitag, 2. November 2007 21:47
 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Betreff: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist

 Hi there

 We have some Problems with the UCEProtect.net blacklist.
 He lists some Subnets and AS who dosnt send Spam from us Customers...
 e.g. the AS6730 (Sunrise) a lot of us costumers using this 
 Provider have Problem on E-Mail Services.
 But really Spammers are not listed :D

 Maybe the Blacklists add some  subnets of Big Companys, cause 
 for delisting you need to pay some money...

 dnsstuff.com uses this blacklist in the lookup tool i dont 
 know how many providers using this list.

 Anyone there know more about this Blacklist?
 The Service is Provided by admins.ws
 and for the fun try www.admins.ws/../../etc/passwd


 Marco


 --
 For list-off Contact use: silicium (-at-) natural-geek.org


 PGP: 49F8 C29E 4F4E E438 BD69 0BCE D1DA 4B0C 7C32 C715



 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
 Version: 3.12
 GCS d-- s-:- a-- C++ UL+++ P-- L+++ E--- W++ N+ o K- w-- 
 O-- M V- PS+++ PE++ Y+ PGP++ t 5 X++ R tv- b+ DI-- D+ 
 G++ e+ h++ r y+ 
 --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--


 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

 

 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
   


-- 
For list-off Contact use: silicium (-at-) natural-geek.org


PGP: 49F8 C29E 4F4E E438 BD69 0BCE D1DA 4B0C 7C32 C715



-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCS d-- s-:- a-- C++ UL+++ P-- L+++ E--- W++ N+ o K- w-- 
O-- M V- PS+++ PE++ Y+ PGP++ t 5 X++ R tv- b+ DI-- D+ 
G++ e+ h++ r y+ 
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist

2007-11-03 Diskussionsfäden Daniel Kamm
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 21:46 +0100, Marco Meile wrote:
 We have some Problems with the UCEProtect.net blacklist.

We considered UCEprotect as absolutely unreliable and unprofessional and
are ignoring listings there. And I think so are 'the big swiss ones'.
And for sure, it's impossible to handle all those RBL which are online.

IMO any postmaster who blockes mails upon one blacklist entry is ...
(what was that polite description of moron?) ;)

Cheers
 - Dan

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist

2007-11-03 Diskussionsfäden Per Jessen
Daniel Kamm wrote:

 On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 21:46 +0100, Marco Meile wrote:
 We have some Problems with the UCEProtect.net blacklist.
 
 We considered UCEprotect as absolutely unreliable and unprofessional
 and are ignoring listings there. And I think so are 'the big swiss
 ones'. 

Hi Daniel,

I would be interested to know why you find UCEprotect to be unreliable
and unprofessional?  

 IMO any postmaster who blockes mails upon one blacklist entry is ...
 (what was that polite description of moron?) ;)

There is no shortage of incompetent postmasters and mail-admins. :-(



/Per Jessen, Herrliberg

-- 
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist

2007-11-03 Diskussionsfäden Per Jessen
Xaver Aerni wrote:

 Wy is unproffesional,
 UCEprotect is blocking AS I think this isn't proffesional. 

Actually, UCEprotect is not blocking anything.  They only provide the
means for other people to do so.  Anyone who uses UCEprotect level3
have been duly warned. 


/Per Jessen, Herrliberg

-- 
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog