thanx for the suggestions - the mtu path discovery
problem was the reason why i asked.
fyi: here in austria we have own access to the copper
from telekom austria (colocation/unbundling)
we have our own dslam´s and our own selection of cpe´s -
so we can build or configure whatever we like.
actually we use static ip on a switched layer 2 vlan-trunk
environment. if possible we want to avoid PPPoA because
we are no atm people.
as i understand you correct mtu 1492 under PPPoE is
still an issue in the mentioned cases.
has anyone tried to build PPPoE with an MTU 1508
infrastructure ?
bernd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabian Wenk
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Spam] Re: [swinog] feedback on pppoe needed
Hello Bernd
Spiess Bernd wrote:
as i know many postings around the world regarding
pppoe mtu problems and advices to customers to
reduce mtu on their clients down to 1492, i wanted
The problems with MTU 1492 could be on other places, eg. if a web
server admin decides to filter ICMP on his server which will
prevent Path MTU Discovery to work. For example this can have the
effect, that from a website (hosted on a server which does not get
the ICMP messages) the HTML part arrived (smaller then 1500
bytes), but the corresponding pictrures do not. I did once write a
paper about the ADSL MTU problem, see Swiss ADSL with PPPoA (and
MTU 1500) [1] for more informations.
[1] http://www.wenks.ch/fabian/ADSL-PPPoA.html
I hope for you, that ADSL with PPPoA will also work in Austria.
bye
Fabian
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog