RE: [swinog] fw change on bluewin adsl accounts today?

2008-04-11 Diskussionsfäden Steven Glogger
ack on that, we've seen the same source.. same time.. 20500 4 240 (T 4935, slot 147) <-> tcp, 212.224.127.14 41215<-> 213.200.x.x 80 20500 9 540 (T 3325, slot 147) <-> tcp, 212.224.127.14 14591<-> 213.200.x.x 80 20500 9 540 (T 2898, slot 147) <-> tcp, 212.224.127.14 39167<-> 213.200.x.x 80 20500

Re: [swinog] fw change on bluewin adsl accounts today?

2008-04-11 Diskussionsfäden Fredy Kuenzler
Schenkel Martin schrieb: Well, the only good solution to this ugly attack is to do what Goetz suggested; As an ISP inbound filter the offending IP address. This is what we did several hours ago and all is fine since then. BTW AS44066 which propagates the offending IP address claims spoofing.

RE: [swinog] fw change on bluewin adsl accounts today?

2008-04-11 Diskussionsfäden Erich Hohermuth
Hello I would be much better to fight the root cause and force every isp in the world to block forged packets. For example with unified reverse path checks facing the customers. Ok, I'm just kidding ... Unfortunately there is no direct benefit for the implementing isp's because it helps all other

RE: [swinog] fw change on bluewin adsl accounts today?

2008-04-11 Diskussionsfäden Schenkel Martin
Well, the only good solution to this ugly attack is to do what Goetz suggested; As an ISP inbound filter the offending IP address. This is what we did several hours ago and all is fine since then. Firewalls of all type of models have/had issues with this attack. On some you might be able to t

Re: [swinog] fw change on bluewin adsl accounts today?

2008-04-11 Diskussionsfäden Olivier Mueller
re, On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:16 +0200, Erich Hohermuth wrote: > We also have a few customers complaining about connection troubles, most > of them have a Zywal. After some netflow debugging we see many port 80 > syn connections which seems the cause of the troubles. Thanks for the feedback Erich!

AW: [Spam] Re: [swinog] fw change on bluewin adsl accounts today?

2008-04-11 Diskussionsfäden Mike Kellenberger
Our connection in our office is being pounded as well... 04/11/2008 16:26:45 Under SYN flood attack, sent TCP RST 212.224.127.14:3978 192.168.10.11:80 TCP RST 04/11/2008 16:26:44 Under SYN flood attack, sent TCP RST 212.224.127.14:11885 192.168.10.11:80 TCP RST 04/11/2008 16:26:42 Under SYN floo

AW: [Spam] Re: [swinog] fw change on bluewin adsl accounts today?

2008-04-11 Diskussionsfäden Mike Kellenberger
Yep, same here... http://service.escapenet.ch/mrtg/escfwconn.html Could someone at Init7 filter these for us? Thanks! Regards, Mike -- Mike Kellenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Escapenet - the Web Company Tel +41 52 235 0700 http://www.escapenet.ch

Re: [swinog] fw change on bluewin adsl accounts today?

2008-04-11 Diskussionsfäden Goetz von Escher
Hi all We notice a heavy DoS attack of TCP SYN packets to port 80 since yesterday 22:02 CEST directed against (random?) targets using a spoofed src ip from Munich (don't call the owner, call your upstream ISP and ask for proper filtering!). Lots of webservers and companies are affected. Some stat

Re: [swinog] fw change on bluewin adsl accounts today?

2008-04-11 Diskussionsfäden Erich Hohermuth
Hello We also have a few customers complaining about connection troubles, most of them have a Zywal. After some netflow debugging we see many port 80 syn connections which seems the cause of the troubles. If someone needs a dump file, just send me a mail. Kind Regards Erich Am Freitag,

Re: [swinog] fw change on bluewin adsl accounts today?

2008-04-11 Diskussionsfäden Ruben Merz
Hello Olivier, I have a similar setting to reach my box at home via an adsl from Bluewin. No problem on my side. Ruben Olivier Mueller wrote: Hello, Still trying to reach the swisscom/bluewin support since 10 minutes (and the robot keeps telling me "voraussichtliche warte zeit: 4-5 minuten"

[swinog] fw change on bluewin adsl accounts today?

2008-04-11 Diskussionsfäden Olivier Mueller
Hello, Still trying to reach the swisscom/bluewin support since 10 minutes (and the robot keeps telling me "voraussichtliche warte zeit: 4-5 minuten" all the time), so I guess it quicker if I ask here as well. It's a simple problem: I manage a few intranet boxes (mail/webproxy) connected to the