Re: [swinog] SwiNOG-18 (details for tomorrow)
I'm awaiting the day my mobile phone gets a IPv6 address allocated over GPRS/EDGE/3G... but knowing Swisscom's quick implementation schedule for new things, I think I will wait for a while there... On the other hand, mobile is the biggest driver for IP use. There are still more mobiles than computers. And frankly, broken NAT's suck. I remember well where i couldn't send mail from my phone for days just because some stupid NAT screwed up the SMTP sessions on port 25 of my mailserver. On 03.04.2009, at 15:26, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: From: Martin Ebnoether On a side-note to all you IPv6 hoslis: Symbian S60 (3rd Edition) is now proven to work out of the box. Tested it yesterday with http://ipv6.google.com/ on my Nokia N82 =:-) it was anyway tunneled through IPv4 with NAT, so no real fun here :) ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] SwiNOG-18 (details for tomorrow)
> From: Martin Ebnoether > On a side-note to all you IPv6 hoslis: Symbian S60 (3rd > Edition) is now proven to work out of the box. Tested it > yesterday with http://ipv6.google.com/ on my Nokia N82 =:-) it was anyway tunneled through IPv4 with NAT, so no real fun here :) ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] SwiNOG-18 (details for tomorrow)
On the Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 05:16:39PM +0200, Olivier Mueller blubbered: Hi all. > > some information for SwiNOG-18: > > Wireless LAN: > > Free WLAN access for all participants will be available at SwiNOG 17: > > Thanks for the organization and the great presentations! And also > thanks to nts for the wifi which worked perfectly. > Time for the social event now! :-) Yes, thanks for the great event and the great presentations! On a side-note to all you IPv6 hoslis: Symbian S60 (3rd Edition) is now proven to work out of the box. Tested it yesterday with http://ipv6.google.com/ on my Nokia N82 =:-) CU, Venty -- Verpassen Sie nicht den neuen Hackerfunk am 04. April 2009. Wie immer von 19:00 bis 20:00 Uhr auf Radio LoRa in Zürich. http://www.hackerfunk.ch/ http://www.lora.ch/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Two-in-One linux box
Hi There are two cheap ways to realise your idea quiet cheap. 1. Linux + dedicated ethernet port + vmware/xen 2. two boards from PCengines.com + USB-cable + custom housing Cheers /adibar On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:28:22PM -0700, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: > > hi all, > > I posted a new idea for a piece of Linux hardware that might be useful in > various network tests, and also as a gateway appliance. Basically it's two > embedded Linux boards in one enclosure, interconnected via USB inside: > > http://www.gizmoforyou.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?800.0 > > The GizmoForYou is a community-driven project where people vote for new > gizmo designs, and the guys implement and sell them. > > Would you be interested in such an appliance? Or maybe you have some > other special needs which could be added in it? > > thanks, > stan > > > ___ > swinog mailing list > swinog@lists.swinog.ch > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog > > -- > This message has been scanned and dangerous content has been removed by our > MailScanner. This includes all executables. If the transfer of executables > is desired please consider to send them as a zip-file, which is allowed to > pass > the checks, but which will be scanned for viruses. > > Please be sure to keep your local Antivirus up-to-date, as this message is no > guarantee that all viruses have been removed. > -- ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Two-in-One linux box
> From: Adrian Baertschi > 1. Linux + dedicated ethernet port + vmware/xen > 2. two boards from PCengines.com + USB-cable + custom >housing 1. I don't want to use i386 architecture 2. No, I don't really want to use i386 architecture :) well, there is some work being done in building a virtualization environment for ARM Cortex processors. But I'm thinking more of a universal appliance where the two linux instances could be used independently or together, depending on the application. ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
