except scanning a /64 takes a ethernity
> On 1 Dec 2019, at 19:05, Nico Schottelius
> wrote:
>
>
> Hey Klaus,
>
> I am surprised you are surprised.
>
> Why would one *not* want to scan your particular home network?
>
> IPv6 is on the rise and scanning networks / IPs is a standard
Hey Klaus,
I am surprised you are surprised.
Why would one *not* want to scan your particular home network?
IPv6 is on the rise and scanning networks / IPs is a standard thing in
the IPv4 world. So it would be a surprise to me, why people would not
want to at least try to find devices in IPv6
Hi,
Currently I see day long IPv6 scans from networks of Akamai
(2a02:26f0:f3::/48), Google (2a00:1450:4000::/37), Apple
(2a01:110::/31), Microsoft (2a01:b740::/29), Swisscom (2001:918::/32)
and Init7 (2001:1620::/32) to my Network @HOME. They all try to
enumerate hosts and ports in
3 matches
Mail list logo