of a DSL pool removed from blacklists by
contacting a local broadband administration with whom they are not customers
strikes me as completely unreasonable.
Charles Buckley
-Original Message-
From: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch]
On Behalf Of Jeroen
moron? I'd prefer not to have to wait
until someone discovers this by happenstance.
Charles Buckley
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
I think that server (coloured) lists are but an easy way out for for those
who either aren't willing or able to do spam mail feature analysis. Spam is
spam, even when it comes from a respectable server that has been temporarily
compromised.
All the up-and-coming premium spam services shy away
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 12:03 PM
To: swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Subject: RE: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist -- join the club
Per Jessen wrote:
Charles Buckley wrote:
And then there is SORBS, which the ETH use, who have chosen to put
the shared server I use for mail
And then there is SORBS, which the ETH use, who have chosen to put the
shared server I use for mail on a blacklist for some reason.
Everyone is going crazy about security, so you're likely to see a
proliferation of providers offering to maintain blacklists, who will do it
badly.
Much better
The prices do look very competitive, and not just for Cisco products.
Thanks for this tip.
What's more, if they're really owned by Coop, then there's a good chance
that if one orders something from them and pays in advance, it will actually
arrive. Coop will not want their reputation to be
I think that the use of spamhaus got pulled into the default setup for
popular spam suites like spamassassin, which many operators running on a
shoestring just update onto their systems with out too much critical review
every time it comes out.
Such behaviour perforce leads to a bump-and-steer
This is the main problem with hardware-based spam solutions -- they may seem
simpler from the purchasing point of view, in that you (the provider) pay
someone a fixed amount of money on a yearly subscription basis, and they
(promise to) make your spam problems go away. Trouble is, they often fail
Adrian,
Aren't you making an error in reflection (Überlegungsfehler)?
If the provider on which one is guesting has a policy to block outbound
access from their network to all ports used for sending of mail, so that
they can force one through their SMTP server for sake of control,
Well, you'd think that would be true, but I travel frequently, and there are
actually hotels that have outsourced their guest IP service to clueless
operators that block outgoing traffic to port 25, and insist that one use
their own SMTP server (about which they fail to tell you until you get one
I was having trouble reaching my site at Q-X and other Swiss sites, too.
But it seems to be back up now. Oddly enough, gmail started working about
30 minutes before everything else.
The thing that cracks me up is, this was first reported on this list on
Friday, and here it is Sunday, and CC
This is what I got from Hostpoint -- I used to be a customer of theirs until
recently.
Greetings from a now calmer Tonga under martial law,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Hostpoint AG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 6:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
12 matches
Mail list logo
