Claudio Jeker writes:
Until recently only AXFR was using tcp,
If you look at the original DNS specs, i.e. RFC 1035, RFC 1123, etc,
you will find that the protocol always specified that any DNS queries
can be performed over TCP. In particular, this is the normal fallback
method when a query over
Hi Xaver,
I had a similar problem when I set up the mail server on
my virtual server and wanted to send mail to domains that
are hosted by zoneedit.com.
After searching a while, I think this is the way how it works:
Step 1:
==
Bluewin does a reverse DNS lookup on your IP (195.141.232.78),
Hi,
Bluewin does a reverse DNS lookup on your IP (195.141.232.78),
..yes
Bluewin does a normal forward DNS lookup, using the result from the
above query.
we don't.
The resolver implementation of our MTA software appears to have a problem
with truncated UDP responses.
(Btw: Why do you have
Franco Hug wrote:
Step 1:
==
Bluewin does a reverse DNS lookup on your IP (195.141.232.78),
which returns the following:
# nslookup
195.141.232.78
;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode.
Server: www.multipop.ch.
Address:195.141.232.253#53
78.232.141.195.in-addr.arpa
Step 1:
==
Bluewin does a reverse DNS lookup on your IP (195.141.232.78), which
returns the following:
# nslookup
195.141.232.78
;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode.
Server: www.multipop.ch.
Address:195.141.232.253#53
78.232.141.195.in-addr.arpa name =
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: [swinog] Has Bluewin a DNS Problem
Hi Xaver,
I had a similar problem when I set up the mail server on
my virtual server and wanted to send mail to domains that
are hosted by zoneedit.com.
After searching a while, I think
you can just take another name for the mailserver of these domains -
only one for all
so you have one PTR Record, pointing to mailserver.domain
then you can use the same domainname for mailserver on the others 29
Domains. this fixes this problem
Silvan
Am 26.03.2008 um 13:45 schrieb
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Per Jessen
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 2:26 PM
To: swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Subject: Re: [swinog] Has Bluewin a DNS Problem
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http
Hi Kurt,
On 26.03.2008, at 15:03, Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
...
This is a silly reverse setup. A reverse lookup should only return
one
hostname, not 20.
...
What about the most stupid wanabe Spam-fighter which are very
unhappy as in place (e.g. the third-party service provider systems
Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
...
This is a silly reverse setup. A reverse lookup should only return
one hostname, not 20.
...
Well, tend to agree.
What about the most stupid wanabe Spam-fighter which are very unhappy
as in place (e.g. the third-party service provider systems acting with
On the Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 01:57:46PM +0100, Adrian Ulrich blubbered:
Hoi.
The resolver implementation of our MTA software appears to have a problem
with truncated UDP responses.
(Btw: Why do you have such a lenghty PTR record for 195.141.232.78 ?)
I may be wrong, but doesn't DNS use TCP if
On the Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 02:42:36PM +0100, Tonnerre Lombard blubbered:
Hoi.
1. it is highly unlikely that these stupid wannabe SPAM filters get the
response containing so many PTR records right. It is most likely
that either the software blows up or that it only ever considers the
Our System receive ex. This MSG
The original message was received at Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:20:47 +0100 from
localhost [127.0.0.1]
- Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to
mxbw.bluewin.ch.:
451 No thanks. (How about PTR records?) ... while talking to
mxzhh.bluewin.ch.:
13 matches
Mail list logo
