Re: [swinog] Connectivity problems with .255 IP Adress

2011-03-31 Diskussionsfäden Benoit Panizzon
Hi Does anybody know of such a problem? Mr. Google couldn't give me any satisfactory results... :-) This looks like a common misconfiguration on multiple 'router' or 'firewalls' to filter such ip addresses. We also had to exclude all .255 and .0 ip addresses from our dhcp ranges because

Re: [swinog] Connectivity problems with .255 IP Adress

2011-03-31 Diskussionsfäden Beat Rubischon
Hi Mike! On 31.03.11 09:44, Mike Kellenberger wrote: One of our customers got a .255 IPv4 address assigned by sunrise. he can't reach any of our Windows Server 2003 hosts Sounds familiar. I had this problem with Windows 9x last time and avoided the usage of .255 and .0 since those days.

Re: [swinog] Connectivity problems with .255 IP Adress

2011-03-31 Diskussionsfäden Oliver Schad
On Thursday 31 March 2011 09:44:27 Mike Kellenberger wrote: One of our customers got a .255 IPv4 address assigned by sunrise. I know that this can be a valid host address with a netmask of /23 or greater, but the strange thing is, that he can't reach any of our Windows Server 2003 hosts with

Re: [swinog] Connectivity problems with .255 IP Adress

2011-03-31 Diskussionsfäden Mario Iseli
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mike Kellenberger mike.kellenber...@escapenet.ch wrote: Hi Hi :) One of our customers got a .255 IPv4 address assigned by sunrise. I know that this can be a valid host address with a netmask of /23 or greater, but the strange thing is, that he can't reach

Re: [swinog] Connectivity problems with .255 IP Adress

2011-03-31 Diskussionsfäden Marcin Cieslak
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Oliver Schad wrote: On Thursday 31 March 2011 09:44:27 Mike Kellenberger wrote: Does anybody know of such a problem? Mr. Google couldn't give me any satisfactory results... :-) There is a old windows bug with .255, maybe it's still not solved.