:: I would suggest an OpenBSD or OpenBSD-based firewall too. We're using
BTW, recent hackathons brought significant improvements not to
mention related work from reyk@ about relayd.
So as monitoring and load balancing role, it is great design.
And beware, you could just love pf and start being
pfSense HAS commercial support !
It is provided by BSD Perimeter and Centipede Networks
Take a look at www.pfsense.org under support.
Open-source and unsupported are two different words.
Daniele
Manuel Krummenacher wrote:
Hello!
On Wed, June 18, 2008 2:06 pm, Olivier Mueller wrote:
Is there
Rainer Duffner wrote:
http://pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=44Itemid=50
and start with that. But the customer would also like to see some non
open-source-based solutions... :
I'd go for a Netscreen model -
The funny thing about this: Netscreen and pfSense are both
Beat Siegenthaler schrieb:
Rainer Duffner wrote:
http://pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=44Itemid=50
and start with that. But the customer would also like to see some non
open-source-based solutions... :
I'd go for a Netscreen model -
The funny thing about this:
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 15:38 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
pfSense is FreeBSD6 ;-)
and the next one will be FreeBSD 7 based, yes :)
Thanks you all for the feedbacks on the list and by mail,
I'll now have fun visiting all your suggestions / urls trying
to select the perfect device.
Merci
Beat Siegenthaler wrote:
In this case You will be forced to deploy M$-ISA ;-)
Please...
He's talking about firewalls... :-)
Oliver, I have pfSense in use and you can also have commercial support from
them.
It's stable and you can run inline-snort with autoblacklist or simple log.
I guess
6 matches
Mail list logo
