Title: RE: [swinog] RFC1918 ip's within trace on normal provider-link ..
Hi
Within a trace it's possible.
That happens quite often.
As long as RFC1918-addresses are not announced, it's OK.
Greets
Günti
|-Original Message-
|From: Nik Hug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent:
I always thought this came from things like someone's
PVC admin interface IP for stuff like frame relay links, no?
-John
Guentensperger, Robert wrote:
Hi
Within a trace it's possible.
That happens quite often.
As long as RFC1918-addresses are not announced, it's OK.
Greets
Günti
|-Original
Hi,
A null route will not stop you from getting those addresses on a trace.
That's problem of your upstream provider's backbone. Well... not really
a problem. Just some people don't like to see them on traces.
Cheers
Jorge
On 16-Jun-2003 Steven Glogger wrote:
hi nik
hmm.. normally we make
hi jorge
i know.
but i prevent it like this in our network - otherwise the internal ip
addresses give some strange traceroutes (go via default route).
if you want to have many, many, many such addresses in your traceroute: log
in via swisscom GPRS and make such a traceroute... :) you have
A null route will not stop you from getting those addresses on a trace.
That's problem of your upstream provider's backbone. Well... not really
a problem. Just some people don't like to see them on traces.
It can actually be a problem, since if that node would want to signal
back icmp messages
