AW: [swinog] Filtering the backbone is BAD!!! Don't do it!!!

2002-07-23 Thread Steven Glogger
hi andre we don't filter anything except for private networks (192.168... and so on..) root@donald(~) ping www.3ivx.com PING 3ivx.com (207.228.238.29) from 193.201.84.50 : 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from pillow.3ivx.com (207.228.238.29): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=111.157 msec 64 bytes from

Re: AW: [swinog] Filtering the backbone is BAD!!! Don't do it!!!

2002-07-23 Thread Roman Hochuli
hi andre we don't filter anything except for private networks (192.168... and so on..) same at our side. :) I'm getting really pissed that more and more upstreams are filtering their entire backbones without telling anyone (not even their ISP customers) and without updating the filters all

RE: AW: [swinog] Filtering the backbone is BAD!!! Don't do it!!!

2002-07-23 Thread Thoma, Stefan
Hello, Who are the bad guys? I know that Sunrise, IP-Plus and COLT are filtering. Anyone else? it seems that mci worldcom and telia doesn't filter anything. intrestingly sunrise does annonuce this route to me, but as bgp prefers mci i can not tell if it is blocked somewhere at

AW: AW: [swinog] Filtering the backbone is BAD!!! Don't do it!!!

2002-07-23 Thread Steven Glogger
the backbone is BAD!!! Don't do it!!! Roman, sunrise does not filter the mentioned site. But yes, Andre you're right, we do filter (bgp blackhole) ~20 host routes. Again my question: why? Please don't ask me (technician) this question as the causes are on OSI layer 8