hi pascal
the shitty letter about 'packet switched services / delivery of intercepted
electronic mail'?
hmm.... i don't know what to do with it :)
> - what are we doing to do?
drink tea and eat cookies. and use this letter as notice paper for further
swinog meetings :)
> - go down to the street with banners?
not good idea. this is confidential. if we go on street with banners it's
not confidential at all :)
> - try to implement as best as possible, even if it doesnt
> exactly fit in the requirements ?
sounds good. haven't you received that damn spam from 'khamsin security' ?
("we developped bblabla.. server..blabla.. LIMES MailControl...blabla..").
> - I remember Orange communications has been involved in the
> creation of this law and...... I m pretty sure they wont be ready on
time....
:-)
> - Start a cookies business (my well known sentence :-P)
i prefer to open a rice plantage in the south of bolivia :)
> - We could do nothing and pay the fines (are those fines already
> defined?)
dunno... i think this is not an good idea. won't be cheap.
> so !?!?! use swinog! lets work together....
so, why don't we develop an open-source software? (see older swinog mails)
> We could open a Working-Group for Lawful Interception.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
would be a good idea. but remember the 'classified/confidential' status of
the letter.
-steven
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im
> Auftrag von Pascal Gloor
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2003 14:24
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: [swinog] Received some fun letter from UVEK ?
>
>
> I hope we're all having a big party together tonite to welcome that nice
> document....
>
> - what are we doing to do?
> - go down to the street with banners?
> - try to implement as best as possible, even if it doesnt
> exactly fit in
> the requirements ?
> - I remember Orange communications has been involved in the
> creation of
> this law and...... I m pretty sure they wont be ready on time....
> - Start a cookies business (my well known sentence :-P)
> - We could do nothing and pay the fines (are those fines already
> defined?)
>
> so !?!?! use swinog! lets work together....
>
> We could open a Working-Group for Lawful Interception.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
>
> P.
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
>
----------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
