hi,
here is a quick and dirty hack for bind8
written by an anger guy (as we all are against verisgin)
http://achurch.org/bind-verisign-patch.html
here for dnscache
http://tinydns.org/djbdns-1.05-ignoreip.patch
of course, this has already been slashdot'ed.
here is another url:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 23:48, Adrian Senn wrote:
Hi
Can you provide a recipe? I think this would save many hours of
RTFM ,-)
some hints are linked on
http://www.symlink.ch/articles/03/09/16/0842201.shtml
Here is a Bind9 Patch: http://carangul.com/patch/
Daniel
BIND 9.2.2-P1 is now available.
In response to high demand from our users, ISC is releasing a patch for BIND
to support the declaration of delegation-only zones in caching/recursive
name servers. Briefly, a zone which has been declared delegation-only will
be effectively limited
does anyone does:
IP ROUTE 64.94.110.11 255.255.255.255 Null0 ?
-steven
__
Steven Glogger
Technical Manager / Software Development
Altrax AG Phone +41 1 256 81 11
Zähringerstrasse 24 Fax +41 1 256 81 12
Steven Glogger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 17 Sep 2003:
does anyone does:
IP ROUTE 64.94.110.11 255.255.255.255 Null0 ?
yes. No complaints so far.
-anthony
--
| Anthony Uk| dataway GmbH | Tel. +41 1 299 9988|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Hohlstrasse 216 | Fax
does anyone does:
IP ROUTE 64.94.110.11 255.255.255.255 Null0 ?
yes. No complaints so far.
I personally dont think this is a good idea, you will just make the
customers able to resolve the host and not being able to contact it. Means,
mail waiting in the queue for days and browsers saying,
Steven Glogger wrote:
does anyone does:
IP ROUTE 64.94.110.11 255.255.255.255 Null0 ?
Not very smart. It will fill your mail server queue with mails to non-
existent domains until final timeout (normally 7 days).
--
Andre
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
same here.
but bind patch sounds like a 'more clean' hack.
still to be done, BTW ;-)
jorge
On 17-Sep-2003 A. Uk / dataway GmbH wrote:
Steven Glogger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 17 Sep 2003:
does anyone does:
IP ROUTE 64.94.110.11 255.255.255.255 Null0 ?
yes. No complaints so far.
its incredible.
even their index is going up:
https://zkb.teledata.de/ZKB.html?SPRACHE=DEMODUL=CHARTSYM=VRSN.NAS
but i'm not a financial specialist if this is normal or just because their
shareholders like what they did...
-steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven Glogger wrote:
nice one: the backup mx server for swinog.ch gave me that back:
The original message was received at Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:43:39 +0200
from office.mrmouse.ch [81.94.96.14]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 550
A. Uk / dataway GmbH wrote:
Steven Glogger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 17 Sep 2003:
i'm not ready to patch only for verisign my dns server, therefore i will
null route the stuff - even if i eliminate some vhosts which are running on
their machine...
exactly. All these solutions which have
and a small mailserver
like all @mail - 0null: hehe
You should reject the mail with a permanent fatal error. Otherwise the
enduser wont get any error message.
Pascal
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
Lukas Beeler wrote:
* Fredy Kuenzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We seem to experience quite a bit of ICMP DOS attacks. The come along in
waves, which makes some devices within our backbone stumble and loosing
packets.
DoS, or the well known nacchi worm? (Nacchi uses 92byte Packets
exclusively, so it
Hello
found on:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sn-20030820-nachi.shtml#policyrouting
says:
Warning: Microsoft Windows tracert utility uses 92 bytes sized ICMP packets.
Using PBR to filter those packets will cause tracert utility not to work.
Nachhi windows tracert's free...
Roger
14 matches
Mail list logo
