On Fri, 30 April 2004 00:37:34 +0200, Daniel Lorch wrote:
Opinions?
Daniel, it will likely buy you not much as still there are
too many open relays or some 'owned' PC with a DSL line
sending stuff themselves to real SMTP servers configured
in the user's Outleak. So of all Spam sent how many of
Hello
Daniel Lorch wrote:
Now's the part I don't quite understand:
4. Because [someone] wants to stop this domain from working,
the DNS servers for this Domain will be attacked (DDoS,
whatever).
I know that RBL servers are quite a popular target among black
hats, but
I checked the log files of our mail servers which I do every
day.
And I was really surprised to find :
Apr 30 08:43:22 mx1 postfix/smtpd[16172]: 5695A568D1:
reject: RCPT from mail4.zkb.ch[62.240.192.40]:
554 Service unavailable; Client host [62.240.192.40] blocked using
I checked the log files of our mail servers which I do every day.
And I was really surprised to find :
Apr 30 08:43:22 mx1 postfix/smtpd[16172]: 5695A568D1: reject: RCPT from
mail4.zkb.ch[62.240.192.40]: 554 Service unavailable; Client host [62.240.192.40]
blocked using relays.ordb.org; This
Quote from Andre:
I would very much prefer if you or anyone else would keep this SPAM
reports to the newsgroups ch.admin to keep the level of useless junk
at least here down.
If I were interested in the latest junk, I could go to my spam-box and
read 200 of them a day - so there is no need to
Blacklist Info: http://ORDB.org/lookup/?host=62.240.192.40
Maybe I am exaggerating but I don't think so.
But it is an open relay:
~ telnet 62.240.192.40 25
Trying 62.240.192.40...
Connected to mail4.zkb.ch.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail4.zkb.ch ESMTP
ehlo mail.lan.ch
250-mail4.zkb.ch
Andre Oppermann wrote:
I would very much prefer if you or anyone else would keep this SPAM
reports to the newsgroups ch.admin to keep the level of useless junk
at least here down.
Ist there a need for spam / abuse / postmaster list? I agree with Andre
that abuse / uce issues should not be
Would prefer not to see spam reports here also.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Fredy Kuenzler
Sent: 30 April 2004 15:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: separate Spam List? (was: Re: [swinog] Hegi is
spamming over spamcom)
hi fredy
as i can remember myself there existed a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailinglist which was kind of frequented.
once fürstli wrote a comment on that list, since then the mailinglist ist
quite empty.
i think we two are both 'paten' for 'new' applicats, not?
or is that list now dead?
-steven
On
Martin Jaggi wrote:
Blacklist Info: http://ORDB.org/lookup/?host=62.240.192.40
Maybe I am exaggerating but I don't think so.
But it is an open relay:
...
The Mailserver is open the the old @@ trick..
They have standard qmail which doesn't do the @@-Relaying unless
you configure it to
/me raises his hand
We all know, that Spam is bad. But handling our abuse-box is already enough
for most of us on the list - no need to share that experience every time it
occurs...
Cheers,
Viktor
On Freitag, 30. April 2004 16.12, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote:
I would very
Steven Glogger wrote:
as i can remember myself there existed a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailinglist which was kind of frequented. once fürstli wrote a
comment on that list, since then the mailinglist ist quite empty. i
think we two are both 'paten' for 'new' applicats, not? or is that
list now dead?
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
I consider that some sort of [EMAIL PROTECTED] list should have at
least all abuse desks of the large providers subscribed. But this would
require a noise-free list.
I agree that simple spam reports don't belong to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
However, there
obviously, someone at zkb is reading the swinog-list:
553 sorry, relaying tricks are not allowed here... (#5.7.1)
--
There are only 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who
understand binary, and those who don't.
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL
Perfect so thats what i wanted :)
i hate spammer who relay trough open relays
if they fixed the proble it is perfect for me
cherio hav a nice weekend
-Ursprngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag von rudolphi
Gesendet: Fr 30.04.2004 20:41
rudolphi wrote:
obviously, someone at zkb is reading the swinog-list:
553 sorry, relaying tricks are not allowed here... (#5.7.1)
I called them at about 5 o'clock and told them. They are about 50 meters
from my office (I'm in the same building as TIX/Telehouse) and I felt as
neighbors I
16 matches
Mail list logo
