Blocking SNMP really makes sense. I'm glad I'm with Tiscali and not
with Balcab, which block all useful ports (such as 80, ..).
Sorry? Without the explicit request by a customer the ISP should not
block _any_ ports at all. Nope!
Feel free to check out your CPE for vulnerabilities and default
P,
Voting is ending usually in laws and regulations, control, blaming...
Don't think this is what's required here. Please stay with the basics.
Agreed?
-Kurt.
PS. For the other case use http://world.altavista.com/tr ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
P,
Highly appreciating what you are doing with SwiNOG and therefore the
community, please don't take me wrong, guess all here _are_ respecting
those rules and those persons. Just trying to avoid the unnecessary,
nothing else. Other problems are waiting to become solutions...
-Kurt.
-Original
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la
part de Fredy Kuenzler Envoye : vendredi, 14. fevrier 2003 14:21 A :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [swinog]
8-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
ACK
-Kurt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steven Glogger
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WAS: [swinog] Swinog-6 - Too many participants, IS: Call for
Beer :)
hi all
involved. Unless it's
Hm,
Après-ski apero?
Skiing, apero, skiing, apero, skiing, apero...
- or for those making the day later
Apero, skiing, apero...
Peter, when do you prefer to start?
-Kurt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter A. Preuss
Sent:
Have not seen the small print saying ...you are not allowed to send direct
e-mails by SMTP, TCP port 25, to other servers or recipients other then the
ISP designated SMTP server... ;-)
Tend to suggest the implementation of mac based machines (e.g. Nomadix
Service Engine) for dial-up customers -
Feel free and rent your fixed IP address or even better some rack space and
bandwidth at your favorite ISP (bet most of the peoples on this list have
plenty...) - and you can perfectly run your private mail server - and even
block SPAM coming in over 100Mb/1G Ethernet long before traveling the
: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [swinog] Mailempfang wegen SPAM blockiert / Mail receipt
becauseof Spam blocks
Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
PS. Looking forward: When do we start implementing RMX (Reverse Mail
Exchange) records in DNS, following the IETF proposal
] Mailempfang wegen SPAM blockiert / Mail receipt
becauseof Spam blocks
Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
Tend to suggest the implementation of mac based machines (e.g. Nomadix
Service Engine) for dial-up customers - hey, no problems with DHCP,
accidentally fixed IP addresses ...and every SMTP port 25 traffic
/ Mail receipt
becauseof Spam blocks
Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
SMTP-AUTH (plain text and preferably CRAM-MD5), SMTPafterPOP or
similar are highly encouraged for any SMTP server - otherwise another
dial-up IP will be listed on the RBLs very soon and the value of your
private server becomes
Ciao Manuel,
Just follow the link provided in the mail(s) - those with the Payment
information for domain names (Zahlungsinformation für Domain-Namen) you
receive about two weeks bevor Switch snail mails the invoice:
__
To:
John,
Suggest every SOHO running own mail servers out of dynamic address range to
configure the associated ISP SMTP server as a
nexthop/smarthost/relay/default-path as discussed here before. On a short to
medium term addresses listed on dynablock.easynet.nl (see
- nic.ch
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:04:38 +0100, Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
I consider this a MAJOR security breach. This has been repeatedly
reported to nic.ch - including their legal and compliance department
(SWITCH
security
responsible) - over the last 12 months:
Well, I would call
John,
Even as a webcom customer - read: for the same high price and a very moderate up- and
downstream rate compared to the hispeed offers
- you have to be happy if you get 45% of the proposed bandwidth at the major usage
times...
A lot of promises of infrastructure will be updated as soon as
There are a lot of similar Schenk-Kreise around, trying to grow. All covered with
nice stories on rituals and topped with some
esoteric and new-age elements.
There is more money involved then in the SPAM example, and they hide under
spend-game, giveaway and similar wordings. Neither the
less,
Marcel,
First, it can't be in the responsibility of a Transit Carrier to block any traffic,
unless it is misrouted or black holed traffic to
protect their or the Access Carrier allocated IP ranges.
A good Swiss ISP does take care - either by calling up their customers or just cut the
line if
i'm a very small fish, so i'm sorry that i can't help more. :)
We will try to rescue you, Nemo ;-)
Greetz,
-Kurt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonas Staempfli
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Raffy,
$ nslookup 217.118.195.58
Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
*** localhost can't find 217.118.195.58: Non-existent host/domain
So let's see:
$ nslookup
Default Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
set type=soa
195.118.217.in-addr.arpa
Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
Received some business cards from some Cablecom business employees this week, and,
after sending a bunch of complaints:
...
Recipient #1: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Route=cablecom.biz
Error count=22
Last error: %MX-W-NOCONTACT, could not establish contact with any mail servers
for
Perfect - another personal firewall. Let's whistle a fax ;-)
-Kurt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Baumann
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 4:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [swinog] Cablecom Personal Firewall
Steven
Full support from our side (once more) - don't hesitate - this is the way to go! Go my
friends - but don't forget to document it
properly first. There is NO reason using a different SMTP server then the ISP for
outgoing mails for this type of connection. Anyone
who is really enforced to use a
gefunden
haben.
---
KCS Engineering Consulting
Kurt A. Schumacher
Härdlenstrasse 116
CH-8302 Kloten
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone +41 1 881 37 80
Fax +41 1 881 37 88
Mobile +41 79 330 45 15
Harry,
Thank you for the notification. Very interesting: To qualify for the position of
Senior Security Engineer, a candidate must have at
least 4 years of IT security experience.
4 years == senior? Uups.
-Kurt.
Senior Security Engineer @42
20+ years in IT systems management, security and
What do you expect? Any reasonable midrange server infrastructure handles 2700 web
transactions in minutes. Looks like an excellent
project planning and systems management...and perfectly reminds me to the ...no, we
don't have any security problem... bs.
Anyone on the list received a IDN
For energy saving reasons the light at the end of the tunnel has been switched off.
Some normality seems to come back, at least web registrations start to work again -
sometimes.
-Kurt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Candid Aeby
Sent:
Hello Michael
If you, your company or your customer has any rights on a name (e.g. company name [not
Einzelfirma, because such names are only
protected at the organizations legal , registered product name, registered trade name,
patents...) there is any chance to gain
control of a (.ch or .li)
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fredy Kuenzler
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 6:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [swinog] Cablecom customer spammin again
Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
A good abuse policy must include a reaction time of a maximum of 15
Daniel,
We're not arguing on the ISP direct responsibility here. It's each ISP infrastructure,
bandwidth, traffic volume, backup tapes and
additional required by law loaded with 65%++ of the e-mail traffic and increasing
every day. Looks like each ISP can easily afford
this part.
But it proofs
SPF. Not convinced, yet?
NO. Microsoft has a patent pending on something like spf.
There are millions of pending patents pending out there which are never.
SPF or something (very) similar should become RFC (think this in the queue anyway) and
the patents discussion will be closed.
-Kurt.
30 matches
Mail list logo
