Matthias Hertzog schrieb:
Alternatively, the way of adding two MX records with the same priority would
be an option too, but i'm not sure if this is enough balanced in the daily
business.
The distribution is pretty good, although the alphabetically first (or
first in the Zone file) seems to get
*sigh*
Everybody, please calm down.
Ok, all the information on www.parlament.ch is now updated. The final
text as approved by the Nationalrat is this:
Art. 45a (neu) Massenwerbung
1 Die Anbieterinnen von Fernmeldediensten bekämpfen die nach Artikel 3
Buchstabe o des Bundesgesetzes vom 19.
Anyone else who cannot reach http://www.admin.ch/ and
http://www.parlament.ch/ (I intended to see the last mile debate)
It's up again. The protocol can be found at
http://www.parlament.ch/ab/frameset/d/n/4705/112465/d_n_4705_112465_112466.htm
-- Matthias, catching up on the debate :)
--
Art. 45a seems like a two-edged sword. Does it mean that ISPs must
filter mails or does it mean that they have to stop spammers from
using their own network?
ISPs are explicitly allowed to filter - which gives them an easy and
clear argument against spammers crying FOUL! I want you to accept my
I know one Marc Schaefer from alphanet.ch (from Usenet activities, e.g.
CHancelbot).
-- Matthias
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
[Sharing SpamAssassin-Rules]
Probably we should open a closed mailing list like we did for LI and
BBCS...
May I step in with a somewhat related idea. Some of you are/were
subscribed to the now mostly inactive spam-ch mailinglist. This list was
set up some two (or is it three?) years ago with
A checksum of the mail is created and if the same mail gets
retransmitted after some time, it will be accepted. Virus-
and spam-mails won't be retransmitted, so they don't get
through.
How long will it be until the spamware or worm-propagation mechanism du
jour will start retrying?
That sort of
Peter Keel wrote:
and every SMTP port 25 traffic (or whatever required in the future) can
perfectly be forwarded to a designated server WITHOUT a possibility for
an intervention on the so called customer side.
Look, I wouldn't want my ISP to do that kind of bollocks, like
auto-proxying me.
* Free or Unregistered dialup
* Situations where you know your customer.
Anybody using free dialups must cope with certain restrictions,
But you said 'Free' or 'Unregistered' dialup. Someone earlier
mentioned DSL/cable connections. Are those what you'd consider
'unregistered'? I'd agree with
G'morning,
Just a quick review: which providers have already installed the
Bind delegation only patch re. Verisign/Sitefinder (or similar
for their environment)?
-- Matthias
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
*.ch for Fredy is fine with me - and *.com and *.net for versign also.
Because I will take .*
Makes nice mail addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-)
-- Matthias
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
PRESSEMITTEILUNG
der text ist ok - ich vermisse irgendwie noch einen kleinen abschnitt, der
aufzeigt, dass dieser fall keine präzedenzfall sein darf. sonst werden wir,
die ISP's, jeden tag mit irgendwelchen neuen filterlisten gefoltert... :(
Right, which I actually proposed, however
einfach in
einer heimlichen Aktion vom Tisch gewischt werden.
Kontakt:
SIUG Matthias Leisi, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Telefon 043 211 03 55, 079 356 39 33
Felix Rauch, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Telefon 078 791 46 00
SwiNOG Fredy Künzler, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefon 01 315 44 00
To be honest, I'm partially guilty of (very) occasionally portscanning
people just to see what's out there, as most of us probably are (for
example, when some customer asks me about why they can't send mail or get
So he asks you to do it and should not complain to you upstream ;)
14 matches
Mail list logo
