Re: [swinog] Black Sheep Swiss ISP: Backbone Solutions (was: Backbone PRO)

2003-04-04 Thread Daniel Lorch
hi, I respectfully disagree. It is one thing to be harbouring spammers, but quite another to be one. This is also not the first time, and discussions with Backbone have proved fruitless. It's thus painfully clear that Backbone are not at all interested in conducting themselves as would befit

RE: [swinog] Black Sheep Swiss ISP: Backbone Solutions (was: Backbone PRO)

2003-04-04 Thread Guentensperger, Robert
Title: RE: [swinog] Black Sheep Swiss ISP: Backbone Solutions (was: Backbone PRO) Hi My two cents: |Finally as ISP you want to earn money and not give your |network for free... Example: An GigE connection at PAIX (Palo Alto NAP) would cost us over 14'000 US$ per month (!!!) In this price

Re: [swinog] Black Sheep Swiss ISP: Backbone Solutions (was: Backbone PRO)

2003-04-04 Thread Jim Romaguera
Hi Daniel, In a peering, both sides of the peer decide how many prefixes/ASNs they will anounce to each other. This allows a UUnet to say I'll announce only my CH-ASN (or EU or global or whatever ASN it decides makes sense). In general, such peerings are done because both parties can tailor a