Re: [swinog] UPC Mailservers problems with greylisting

2017-01-04 Diskussionsfäden Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Am Mi den 4. Jan 2017 um 8:54 schrieb Per Jessen: > Is there any point in greylisting genuine mailservers? We only greylist > dodgy-looking setups. I had the same in mind but didn't post as I only run a small server pressent days. I

[swinog] using Git as a database back-end

2017-01-04 Diskussionsfäden Stanislav Sinyagin
hi all, I'm preparing a new release of Torrus software, and it will replace BerkeleyDB back-end with Git. It appears that libgit2 provides a new, a bit tricky in learning, but very efficient object storage, and change tracking is available out of the box. In general, you can read and write your

[swinog] NAS Housing

2017-01-04 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Velder
Hi SwiNOG Currently I'm looking for housing of my private Synology RS216 NAS (backup purposes) with the following requirements: - Housing for a small MikroTik (RB750GL, ..) - Housing for the NAS - 1x IPv4 / routed IPv6 /64 (or BGP, I'll bring /24 and /48) - No colozüri If someone can offer

Re: [swinog] NAS Housing

2017-01-04 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Velder
Hi SwiNOG Of course I mean DS216j, not a RackStation. Regards Patrick Am 4. Januar 2017 23:35:21 MEZ schrieb Patrick Velder : >Hi SwiNOG > >Currently I'm looking for housing of my private Synology RS216 NAS >(backup purposes) with the following requirements: > >- Housing for a

Re: [swinog] UPC Mailservers problems with greylisting

2017-01-04 Diskussionsfäden Viktor Steinmann
On 04.01.2017 08:54, Per Jessen wrote: Is there any point in greylisting genuine mailservers? We only greylist dodgy-looking setups. /Per I don't see how this approach would scale. We greylist everything. If some mail servers appear to have a problem with that and are legit, they are

Re: [swinog] UPC Mailservers problems with greylisting

2017-01-04 Diskussionsfäden Beat Siegenthaler
On 03.01.17 16:27, Benoit Panizzon wrote: > Same Problem here, since at least 24. December. > Same here since beginning of december. Whitelistied UPC 9.12. 21:37 I do not greylist servers with correct spf record. With UPC i think the main problem is the missing NDR. happy new year!! Beat

Re: [swinog] UPC Mailservers problems with greylisting

2017-01-04 Diskussionsfäden Per Jessen
Viktor Steinmann wrote: > On 04.01.2017 08:54, Per Jessen wrote: >> >> Is there any point in greylisting genuine mailservers? We only >> greylist dodgy-looking setups. >> >> >> /Per >> > I don't see how this approach would scale. To my knowledge, it scales quite well. We maintain a list of