Re: [swinog] Visit of Billag AG at home !

On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 15:20 +0200, Willy van Gulik wrote: [...] I own a car and didn't plugged the antenna so I m unable to receive any FM Radio and so on. My building hasn't any antenna connection to cable or whatever. [...] Sorry, this might be fully OT, but never mind. Let's back up the

Re: [swinog] swisscom dsl down?

On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 10:00 +0200, Martin Ebnoether wrote: Even here at GPS Technik AG, customers do call in. We don't sell ADSL or do ADSL but people complain anyway. Also here customers called in saying I can't reach... Cheers - Dan ___ swinog

Re: [swinog] good and bad blacklists?

Hi Marco On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 11:28 +0100, Marco Balmer wrote: Has everyone experiences with good and bad blacklists for mail-servers? For the moment I use the following three: relays.ordb.org sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org bl.spamcop.net What about dnsrbl.swinog.ch? :-D or: dnsbl.sorbs.net is

Re: [swinog] Out-of-Office Policies?

EHLO On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 08:21 +0200, Viktor Steinmann wrote: - We all agree OoO should not be sent to Mailinglists. This can usually be achieved by checking for precedence bulk and not replying to those. The easiest way to achieve that, is to use a separate mail box to handle mailing list

Re: [swinog] Formmailer-Scripts and Spam

On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 17:35 +0200, Matthias Hertzog wrote: We're facing a growing amount of automatically generated HTTP POST requests, all containing spamvertising links We are also struggling with this issue, but not only since a few days or weeks. I get 3-6 abused forms each day! IMO it's

Re: AW: [swinog] Sunrise network issues?

On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 15:07 +0200, Gunther Stammwitz wrote: Some performance measurements from Frankfurt: Back to our studies, we tried to implement a system, that periodically stores traceroutes from looking glass servers to some other endpoints. The main goal was to display a map which shows

Re: [swinog] smtp attacks

On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 17:58 +0100, Rene Luria wrote: It is due to bounces coming from everywhere. Spamers using fake email addresses from domains for which we are the MX. The amount of such emails (which we almost all reject, user unknown, etc.. because of the fake email addresses) is

RE: [swinog] Candid Aeby is out of the office.

On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 15:41 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So what is your proposal? there are several solutions: a. quit the company b. fire / mob the mcma (mentally challenged mail admin) c. install your own mailexchanger and forward all mails to that one d. slap the mcma until he

Re: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist

On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 21:46 +0100, Marco Meile wrote: We have some Problems with the UCEProtect.net blacklist. We considered UCEprotect as absolutely unreliable and unprofessional and are ignoring listings there. And I think so are 'the big swiss ones'. And for sure, it's impossible to handle

RE: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist -- join the club

On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 10:54 +0100, Per Jessen wrote: commercial Nah, leave the spam-filtering to us :-) The user and the ISP both have better things to do. /commercial :-D - Dan ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch

RE: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist -- join the club

On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 12:29 +0100, Charles Buckley wrote: The provider moved instantaneously to identify the offender and kick them out. The compromised SMTP account is now closed. But, just as Sunrise, they are not willing to pay the fee to SORBS to change the status on the list. As ISP

RE: [swinog] Windows-Pizza

On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 14:39 -0800, Scott Weeks wrote: Lynx says it all: ** Bad HTML!! ...snipped stuff here... No wonder: Taken out of 'the real site' shown in msie: !-- index.php Start von shop-pizza.novalku.com äöü 07.10.01 -- !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01

Re: Re: [swinog] The truth about UCEPROTECT-Blocklists

Dear Claus On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 02:41 +0100, Claus v. Wolfhausen wrote: we have Level 1 listed the IP 195.162.162.159 spamming the list with it's stupid autoresponder, so if swinog uses UCEPROTECT-Level 1 the loop should be broken now. Tell me, that you are not really blocking IPs because

Re: AW: [swinog] Large IP Block at Akamai?

I've tested some connections I have access to with a pretty interesting result: - Two BB accesses within AS8404, one got access to [1], the other one not! - One ADSL behind AS21494 works fine. - Upstream traffic over AS13030 works fine. To me it seems like a large IP block on Akamai spread over

RE: AW: [swinog] Large IP Block at Akamai?

On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 01:05 -0800, Christian Jouas wrote: 8404 has some Akamai servers inhouse This is it! Changed nameserver to AS8404 nameservers, Sites had been available again. So it seems that Akamai traffic is not allowed to cross AS8404 but has to be loaded from the Akamai servers within

RE: AW: [swinog] Large IP Block at Akamai?

On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 01:05 -0800, Christian Jouas wrote: 8404 has some Akamai servers inhouse And we are using our own name servers which are not behind 8404 access network. That could be the reason. Stdby... - Dan ___ swinog mailing list

Re: [swinog] bluewin ADSL ... everything okay?

On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:08 AM, Matthias Hertzog wrote: Does anyone else in here receives phone calls, that websites and mailservers cannot be reached from bluewin ADSL? Yes, we too. Customers report, that instead of our company site they receive a my-space site with our logo on it. Cheerz

Re: [swinog] RBL's (again) (Was: Anyone from Green here?)

On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Marco wrote: we made the experience that not greylisting itself is the problem. the problem are miss configured mailservers with wrong queue times or servers interpreting the greylisting temp error code as an error. There are times, where the sending MTAs queue

Re: [swinog] IP Management Tool

On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 11:39 +0100, Viktor Steinmann wrote: alternative to managing IP addresses on a Spreadsheet... I personally prefer any Wiki to a Spreadsheet. It's able to handle multiple users at a time, searchable, versionised and has about the same clarity. - Dan

Re: [swinog] F*ing Spammers and stupid customer code...

Mike Kellenberger wrote: totally correct, thanks! Looks like I'm the stupid SysAdmin as well... :-) Actually, this problem is known since ages. I wonder, why you fall into that right now. But what I really realise is, that this list is populated by Swiss Hosting Sysadmins from all important

Re: [swinog] SWITCH Sourceforge mirror available again

Pascal, Pascal Gloor wrote: It should be Note that, like mirror.switch.ch and many other of our services, this is reachable over IPv4 in addition to IPv6 As long as IPv6 is not availabe for the end user *by default* (and I mean that as a broad hint for all the big xDSL and Cable providers),

Re: [swinog] Greylisting

Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: last AprilMartin Blapp has presented a nice concept at SwiNOG: instead of greylisting, the SMTP server delays the first OK response to HELO/EHLO for 30 seconds. That is usually enough for the vast majority of spambots to give up. On a heavy traffic mail server,

Re: [swinog] Debian vs. Ubuntu

Hi Benjamin Am 1/28/10 4:51 PM, schrieb Benjamin Schlageter: Just running normal ISP services like dhcp, dns, webserver and so on. Main focus is the long support, maybe I'll wait for 10.04 LTS - so I got support to the year 2015:) I run several Ubuntu Server boxes. For the services you

Re: [swinog] ProLiant Debian

Am 2/21/10 10:49 AM, schrieb Alexandre Suter: You can find 2.5 trays on e-bay though (look for the corresponding Sun part number). For HP ProLiant users, that one could be very handy: http://www.pcp.ch/product-1a15080534.htm?parnr=12832879 Cheerz, - Dan

Re: [swinog] Performance Problems today...

Am 5/7/10 10:39 AM, schrieb Pascal Gloor: Yet again a fantastic FAIL of an ALL-IN-ONE-CAN-ALSO-DO-COFFEE firewall. As long as it doesn't fail to brew coffee, I thing that device is still doing it's duty. scnr, - Dan ___ swinog mailing list

Re: [swinog] Internet connectivity maps for 2000 from Sunrise and (gasp) Nextra

love to. I'm using Geoff Huston's BGP data for the time being, but other pointers could be useful. Thanks T On 5/18/10 2:50 PM, Daniel Kamm wrote: Hello Thomas, are you looking for BGP tables back on 2000? I remember I was using some online BGP table archive for a study work of mine, but I cant

Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

Dear Serge On 11/11/2010 08:22 AM, Serge Droz wrote: From different third parties we receive a fairly large number of URLs in .ch/.li ccTLDs which distribute malware. We're talking a few hundred URLs per week. In a first step SWITCH verifies that this claim is true. On the first glance, this

Re: [swinog] Blocking Malware distribution sites

On 11/11/2010 11:01 AM, Martin Jaggi wrote: You did mention AEFV SR784.104. Art 14bis requires Switch to do this: Die Registerbetreiberin muss einen Domain-Namen blockieren und die diesbezügliche Zuweisung zu einem Namenserver aufheben: a. wenn der begründete Verdacht besteht, dass

Re: [swinog] www.bluewin.ch not on DNS. Monitored from 2 locations. Anyone else?

Uhu! On 06.04.2014 02:48, Matthias Hertzog wrote: $ ping www.bluewin.ch ping: cannot resolve www.bluewin.ch: Unknown host The authoritative nameserver do not answer: adnso1.bluewin.ch [195.186.196.180] adnso2.bluewin.ch [195.186.196.190] adnsz1.bluewin.ch [195.186.145.180] adnsz2.bluewin.ch

[swinog] Bluewin MX Protocol Errors

Do any other also got troubles in messaging @bluewin.ch customers? Nov 2 14:32:54 postfix/smtp[8102]: : to=, relay=mxbw.lb.bluewin.ch[195.186.99.50]:25, delay=0.07, delays=0/0/0.03/0.03, dsn=5.5.0, status=bounced (Protocol error: host mxbw.lb.bluewin.ch[195.186.99.50] said: 250

Re: [swinog] Bluewin MX Protocol Errors

Many thanks to Marcel Gschwandl, we are still investigating together the root cause for these problems. For a workaround, try to disable TLS for @bluewin.ch and @bluemail.ch Postfix/main.cf smtp_tls_policy_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/tls_policy # cat tls_policy bluewin.ch none bluemail.ch none

Re: [swinog] Zukunft von Abuse Desks

On 19.03.2016 22:35, Gregor Riepl wrote: Oder ein Script basteln das das Captcha löst und automatisiert das Abuse-Formular ausfüllt... Yes!! Automatically spamming Hotmail Abuse Desk with IP removal requests for 127.0.0.0/8. Go ahead please! Regards, - Dan

[swinog] Advice after hoax

Hey mates, Sorry for off topic, but I've just got hoaxed by someone by adding one of my email addy to quite a number of newsletter lists, manually. Though most of them are on opt-in nicely. Seems like I've tread on someones toes lately. However, I am quite curious who it was or, at least,