1.) Check with https://www.ict-plus.ch They have a lot experiences with Long reach wifi... 2.) why not just a standard USV? Solar or Wind buffered... or is a normal power supply only sometimes available?
Fründlechi Grüess Martin Fischer > Am 09.08.2018 um 11:08 schrieb swinog-requ...@lists.swinog.ch: > > Send swinog mailing list submissions to > swinog@lists.swinog.ch > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > swinog-requ...@lists.swinog.ch > > You can reach the person managing the list at > swinog-ow...@lists.swinog.ch > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of swinog digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Battery powered wifi link (20km, multihop) (Nico Schottelius) > 2. Re: Battery powered wifi link (20km, multihop) (Andreas Fink) > 3. Re: Battery powered wifi link (20km, multihop) (Matthias Cramer) > 4. Huge Packetloss towards switch mirrors? (Benoit Panizzon) > 5. Re: Huge Packetloss towards switch mirrors? (Florian Bruhin) > 6. Re: Huge Packetloss towards switch mirrors? (Benoit Panizzon) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 15:43:54 +0200 > From: Nico Schottelius <nico.schottel...@ungleich.ch> > To: swinog <swinog@lists.swinog.ch> > Subject: [swinog] Battery powered wifi link (20km, multihop) > Message-ID: <87bmadj7mt....@line.ungleich.ch> > Content-Type: text/plain > > > Hey Swinog, > > does anyone have experiences with long distance (~20km) wifi powered > by battery? > > With have the situation that we basically want to connect Schwanden to > Linthal by wifi for at least 12 hours. > > The idea is to go via several hops, some of them not having any power > resource. > > So my questions to the list are: > > - What kind of equipment have you used for similar cases or can you recommend? > - Are there any battery recommendations? > - Other creative ideas on how to get a direct link with >= 100 Mbit/s > connectivity? > > Best, > > Nico > > > > > -- > Your Swiss, Open Source and IPv6 Virtual Machine. Now on > www.datacenterlight.ch. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 15:58:41 +0200 > From: Andreas Fink <af...@list.fink.org> > To: Nico Schottelius <nico.schottel...@ungleich.ch> > Cc: swinog <swinog@lists.swinog.ch> > Subject: Re: [swinog] Battery powered wifi link (20km, multihop) > Message-ID: <1593479f-df99-4d13-ba96-2d14e7e29...@list.fink.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > >> On 8 Aug 2018, at 15:43, Nico Schottelius <nico.schottel...@ungleich.ch> >> wrote: >> >> >> Hey Swinog, >> >> does anyone have experiences with long distance (~20km) wifi powered >> by battery? >> >> With have the situation that we basically want to connect Schwanden to >> Linthal by wifi for at least 12 hours. >> >> The idea is to go via several hops, some of them not having any power >> resource. >> >> So my questions to the list are: >> >> - What kind of equipment have you used for similar cases or can you >> recommend? >> - Are there any battery recommendations? >> - Other creative ideas on how to get a direct link with >= 100 Mbit/s >> connectivity? >> > > > Given big enough dishes and line of sight, this is achieveable. We had 40km > links in rural areas of Iceland working. Its all a question of terrain, > interfearance and right equipment. > As far as power goes, a solar system can help to keep it operational. > >> Best, >> >> Nico >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Your Swiss, Open Source and IPv6 Virtual Machine. Now on >> www.datacenterlight.ch. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swinog mailing list >> swinog@lists.swinog.ch >> http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 16:33:52 +0200 > From: Matthias Cramer <matthias.cra...@iway.ch> > To: <swinog@lists.swinog.ch> > Subject: Re: [swinog] Battery powered wifi link (20km, multihop) > Message-ID: <d9b86b8c-af79-219a-0b19-867e78854...@iway.ch> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hoi Nico > > Mit einem P?rchen Antennen wie diesen an jedem Hop ist das sicher machbar. > > https://mikrotik.com/product/RBLHG-5HPnD > > Als Baterien kannst du z.B. 100AH Autobateriene einsetzen, damit bekommst du > ?ber 70h Betriebsdauer mit zwei Antennen... > > Du musst jedoch daf?r sorgen das du zwischen den Antennen freie Sicht hast, > sonst wird das nicht wirklich funktionieren. > > Wir haben vor vielen Jahren mal einen WiFi Link zwischen Otelfingen und > Regensdorf ohne zwischenhop gemacht (~8km), das hat > mehrere Jahr stabil funktioniert. War jedoch anderes Equipment. > > Gruss Matthias > > >> On 08/08/18 15:43, Nico Schottelius wrote: >> >> Hey Swinog, >> >> does anyone have experiences with long distance (~20km) wifi powered >> by battery? >> >> With have the situation that we basically want to connect Schwanden to >> Linthal by wifi for at least 12 hours. >> >> The idea is to go via several hops, some of them not having any power >> resource. >> >> So my questions to the list are: >> >> - What kind of equipment have you used for similar cases or can you >> recommend? >> - Are there any battery recommendations? >> - Other creative ideas on how to get a direct link with >= 100 Mbit/s >> connectivity? >> >> Best, >> >> Nico >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Your Swiss, Open Source and IPv6 Virtual Machine. Now on >> www.datacenterlight.ch. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swinog mailing list >> swinog@lists.swinog.ch >> http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog >> > > > -- > Matthias Cramer / mc322-ripe Senior Network & Security Engineer > iway AG Phone +41 43 500 1111 <sip:0435001111> > Badenerstrasse 569 Fax +41 44 271 3535 <sip:0442713535> > CH-8048 Z?rich http://www.iway.ch/ > GnuPG 1024D/2D208250 = DBC6 65B6 7083 1029 781E 3959 B62F DF1C 2D20 8250 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:50:18 +0200 > From: Benoit Panizzon <benoit.paniz...@imp.ch> > To: swi...@swinog.ch > Subject: [swinog] Huge Packetloss towards switch mirrors? > Message-ID: <20180809105018.481bb...@go.imp.ch> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Hi Community > > Anyone else experiencing high latency and packetloss towards > > ch.archive.ubuntu.com / mirror.switch.ch > > IPv4 via SwissIX. > IPv6 via HE. > > --- frisal.switch.ch ping statistics --- > 99 packets transmitted, 34 received, 65% packet loss, time 99279ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 425.674/601.445/705.015/62.817 ms > > --- ch.archive.ubuntu.com ping statistics --- > 21 packets transmitted, 7 received, 66% packet loss, time 20262ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 531.911/594.194/645.790/43.318 ms > > Mit freundlichen Gr?ssen > > -Beno?t Panizzon- > -- > I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden > ______________________________________________________ > > Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 > CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 > Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch > ______________________________________________________ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:03:11 +0200 > From: Florian Bruhin <m...@the-compiler.org> > To: Benoit Panizzon <benoit.paniz...@imp.ch> > Cc: swi...@swinog.ch > Subject: Re: [swinog] Huge Packetloss towards switch mirrors? > Message-ID: <20180809090311.6lozw7uptirpmqk2@hooch.localdomain> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:50:18AM +0200, Benoit Panizzon wrote: >> Anyone else experiencing high latency and packetloss towards >> >> ch.archive.ubuntu.com / mirror.switch.ch > > Switch seems to be having trouble: > https://www.switch.ch/network/operations/trouble-tickets/?action=show&id=1399 > > Florian > > -- > https://www.qutebrowser.org | m...@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) > GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | https://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc > I love long mails! | https://email.is-not-s.ms/ > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 833 bytes > Desc: not available > URL: > <http://lists.swinog.ch/public/swinog/attachments/20180809/403c4000/attachment-0001.pgp> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:08:44 +0200 > From: Benoit Panizzon <benoit.paniz...@imp.ch> > To: swi...@swinog.ch > Subject: Re: [swinog] Huge Packetloss towards switch mirrors? > Message-ID: <20180809110844.206de...@go.imp.ch> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Am Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:59:47 +0200 > schrieb Claudio Kuenzler <c...@claudiokuenzler.com>: > >> Update: Switch just changed something in their routing. >> No packet loss anymore from both source networks. > > PING ch.archive.ubuntu.com(frisal.switch.ch (2001:620:0:1002::20)) 56 data > bytes > ^C > --- ch.archive.ubuntu.com ping statistics --- > 14 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 13293ms > > Here it's worse for IPv6 :-) > IPv4 indeed is fine now. > > https://www.woody.ch/cgi-bin/smokeping.cgi?filter=switch;target=World.Europe.Switzerland.Networks.Switch > > Mit freundlichen Gr?ssen > > -Beno?t Panizzon- > -- > I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden > ______________________________________________________ > > Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 > CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 > Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch > ______________________________________________________ > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > swinog@lists.swinog.ch > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog > > > End of swinog Digest, Vol 163, Issue 2 > **************************************
_______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
