On Jun 19, 2008, at 6:21 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> I think this is a mirror of sorts of the one we got our text from
The website where we get our text actually stores it here.
>
>
> I saw this sometime yesterday too.
>
> Peter
>
> DM Smith wrote:
>> Chris Little wrote:
>>> Peter von Kaehne
I think this is a mirror of sorts of the one we got our text from
I saw this sometime yesterday too.
Peter
DM Smith wrote:
> Chris Little wrote:
>> Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>>
>>> I found this image file which is quite interesting:
>>>
>>> http://www.bible-researcher.com/luthercomma.jpg
>>>
>>
DM Smith wrote:
>
> Matt 5:38
>
> GerAlbrecht
> Ihr habt gehört, daß gesagt worden ist: Auge um Auge und Zahn um Zahn !
> Note: the extraneous space before the ! and no quotation marks.
The space is wrong, the lack of quotation marks is ok.
>
> GerFreeBible
> Ihr habt gehört, dass gesagt ist
Chris Little wrote:
> Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>
>> I found this image file which is quite interesting:
>>
>> http://www.bible-researcher.com/luthercomma.jpg
>>
>> Look at the behaviour of the S - begin and inside words it looks like a
>> f, but at the end it looks like an s.
>>
>
> Long s (
I thought the following is an intriguing comparison:
(I would have said "interesting", but Peter tells me that in his lingo,
it is used to placate people ;)
Matt 5:38
GerAlbrecht
Ihr habt gehört, daß gesagt worden ist: Auge um Auge und Zahn um Zahn !
Note: the extraneous space before the ! and n
We should also test the beta modules in the BibleTool (aka swordweb)
I have put up the beta modules in the BibleTool reachable at:
http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/swordweb/webapp
(Note, this is built from trunk not tagged 1.5.11. I presume that there
are few differences. Let me know if I need t
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:17 PM, DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathan Youngman wrote:
>> Well, Apple finally accepted me for the developer program... not sure
>> if this license (Jun 8th) is any different than before concerning FOSS:
>>
>> "If Your Application includes any FOSS, You agree
Nathan Youngman wrote:
> Well, Apple finally accepted me for the developer program... not sure
> if this license (Jun 8th) is any different than before concerning FOSS:
>
> "If Your Application includes any FOSS, You agree to comply with all
> applicable FOSS licensing terms. You also agree not
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Nathan Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, Apple finally accepted me for the developer program... not sure
> if this license (Jun 8th) is any different than before concerning FOSS:
>
> "If Your Application includes any FOSS, You agree to comply with all
>
Well, Apple finally accepted me for the developer program... not sure
if this license (Jun 8th) is any different than before concerning FOSS:
"If Your Application includes any FOSS, You agree to comply with all
applicable FOSS licensing terms. You also agree not to use any FOSS in
developme
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> There are a bunch of things that seem peculiar about content at
> upper-level keys.
>
> First, why is there a single top-level key "/Jub"? If there is no
> actual division at that level, why does that level exist?
Standard references to the book of Jubilees will appear a
There are a bunch of things that seem peculiar about content at
upper-level keys.
First, why is there a single top-level key "/Jub"? If there is no
actual division at that level, why does that level exist?
Bible references are causing minor difficulty. /Jub/2 contains:
[=Gen.1-2]
But GS cannot
Regarding searching, couldn't one encode the text with elements
having an attribute with the searchable representation of the word and
change the SWORD engine to index these as well (at the same position
as the displayed word).
On Jun 19, 2008, at 4:42 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Chris L
Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please take a look at the two Summa Theologica modules I've just
> uploaded. I would like an opinion on which seems to be a better module
> (and should be moved towards the public repository).
There are a number of items in AquinasSummaTheologica that
To summarize what I have heard on the thread:
While the printer may have used leading 'V' for 'U' (and 'v' for 'u'),
the reader would have known that those were 'U' and 'u' respectively.
Likewise for i and j.
IMHO, if it is of value to retain the visual representation of the
original, then t
On Jun 19, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Wolfgang Schultz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> here is a link which some pictures of a orginal "Luther 1545 letzte
> Hand"
>
> http://www.wlb-stuttgart.de/sammlungen/bibeln/bestand/besondere-stuecke/luther-bibel-1545/
>
> perhaps on should use a magnifying glass :-)))
The thi
Hi,
here is a link which some pictures of a orginal "Luther 1545 letzte Hand"
http://www.wlb-stuttgart.de/sammlungen/bibeln/bestand/besondere-stuecke/luther-bibel-1545/
perhaps on should use a magnifying glass :-)))
gruß
wolfgang
2008/6/19 Manfred Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Am 19.
Chris Little wrote:
>
> Long s (ſ U+017F) still appears today as the left half of the letter ß,
> which comes from a ligature of ſ and z (or ʒ).
That is actually not even very old. My dad still learnt the gothic hand
writing regularly at school, while I learnt it from him out of interest
as a te
Hi Peter,
Which file format were the files as used for making the original SWORD
module?
The files I received directly by email from the brother in Turkey are for
the NT only, and are in RTF format. I was assured that these are the most up
to date text.
They are very concerned that any distri
Am 19.06.2008 um 08:53 schrieb Chris Little:
>
>
> Manfred Bergmann wrote:
>>> http://www.bible-researcher.com/luthercomma.jpg
>>
>> I would say even in this ancient german the u is a "u" and not a "v"
>> be it at the beginning of a word or within.
>
> Compare line 1, word 4, und with line 5, wo
20 matches
Mail list logo
