On 06/03/12 01:42, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
It is most likely a misunderstanding. Perhaps I have also been
misunderstanding some of the messages that seem to be opposed to USFM.
I'm not trying to suggest that USFM be made an additional internal
format for Sword for Bible search and
Matěj,
Moving the title element to after the verse milestone and adding the subType
attribute might solve the problem. It's worth a try, at least.
verse sID=Ruth.1.1 osisID=Ruth.1.1/title subType=x-preverse
type=chapterElímelekova rodina/title
I stalo se za dnů, transChange
A further clarification about my suggestion that DM might add the wikimedia
extension called USFMTAG.
1. CrossWire Bible Society is not yet a member of the Forum of Bible
Agencies International, so generally speaking CrossWire volunteers do not
have access to a registered copy of *UBS Paratext*,
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson
kahunap...@mpj.cx wrote:
On 03/05/2012 08:07 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
On 05/03/12 17:33, Greg Hellings wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Kahunapule Michael
Johnsonkahunap...@mpj.cx kahunap...@mpj.cx wrote:
As many are likely aware, the Verity Project has produced a program that
displays the NET and WLC in parallel with the verses lining up properly
(at least where I have tested it). Many of the building blocks are there
to do that in SWORD, and Peter mentioned there are efforts in the works
to
Thanks Daniel,
I'd not come across the project before, and I suspect others on this list
may be in the same boat.
Here's the link I found - http://www.theverityproject.com/
Source code (early stages) is at http://code.google.com/p/theverityproject/
but this may eventually be moved from google.
FYI,
A release candidate for the next version of ICU is available. It
implements Unicode 6.1.
(They are going to a new version naming so rather than 4.10, this is
called 49. In the past the second number was even for formal releases;
odd for dev releases. Now they are just going to combine
On 5.3.2012 23:57, Nic Carter wrote:
My thought is what if the reader doesn't have Strong's Numbers
switched on in the software? Then it won't be visible. Instead do you
want these markings to appear all the time for the user? If so, then
using those other marks would probably be preferable?
On 03/06/2012 12:47 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
You accurately preserve all of the original text and
punctuation (including quotation punctuation) exactly as
it was in the original USFM. This involves the complete
All front ends should display all text with the punctuation as given.
Anything other than that is a bug that must be fixed.
They will differ on their styling of that text.
On 03/06/2012 02:17 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
On 03/06/2012 12:47 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
1. You
On 03/05/2012 09:59 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
...
I'm trying to convert Scripture files on a scale and with speed that
is apparently unprecedented.
The scale might be unprecedent, but there are reasons for that
1) None of us have yet encountered a USFM text which is actually clean.
It
On 6.3.2012 10:59, David Haslam wrote:
Moving the title element to after the verse milestone and adding the subType
attribute might solve the problem. It's worth a try, at least.
Is that a proper semantic coding? Seems kind of weird to add chapter
title behind verse element.
Matěj
--
On 7.3.2012 00:28, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On 6.3.2012 10:59, David Haslam wrote:
Moving the title element to after the verse milestone and adding the
subType
attribute might solve the problem. It's worth a try, at least.
Is that a proper semantic coding? Seems kind of weird to add chapter
title
On 03/05/2012 08:10 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
So, I have this as a beginning of the book of Ruth (which I believe is
exactly according to :
div type=book osisID=Ruth canonical=true
chapter sID=Ruth.1 osisID=Ruth.1 canonical=true/
title type=chapterElímelekova rodina/title
verse sID=Ruth.1.1
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson
kahunap...@mpj.cx wrote:
On 03/06/2012 12:47 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
1. You accurately preserve all of the original text and punctuation
(including quotation punctuation) exactly as it was in the original USFM.
This
Troy A. Griffitts scr...@crosswire.org writes:
Yes. If you compile xiphos against sword svn, it should be fixed.
Yeah. Matěj, as a first effort, you need to upgrade to 3.1.5, just on
general principles, because a great deal has been done since 3.1.4.
Beyond that, building your own Sword
16 matches
Mail list logo