Re: [sword-devel] TEI formatting, duplicated key (BDB Glosses)

2012-04-30 Thread David Troidl
Hi Chris, I'm certainly no expert on your TEI dictionaries, but wouldn't it make sense to have the first key be one that would sort properly, and present the dictionary in true alphabetical order? I'm thinking of Middle Liddell, as well as the Hebrew. This key wouldn't even necessarily have

Re: [sword-devel] TEI formatting, duplicated key (BDB Glosses)

2012-04-30 Thread Daniel Owens
On 04/30/2012 06:54 AM, Chris Little wrote: On 4/30/2012 4:39 AM, David Troidl wrote: Hi Chris, I'm certainly no expert on your TEI dictionaries, but wouldn't it make sense to have the first key be one that would sort properly, and present the dictionary in true alphabetical order? I'm

[sword-devel] lemma systems

2012-04-30 Thread Daniel Owens
The related discussion about TEI markup and lexicon keys raises another issue: lemma systems. Currently the only defined lemma system is strong. It is easy to connect to, but we need to move beyond it. I have several questions: 1. Should we define new lemma systems? 2. How can we make such

Re: [sword-devel] TEI formatting, duplicated key (BDB Glosses)

2012-04-30 Thread DM Smith
On 04/30/2012 09:37 AM, Daniel Owens wrote: On 04/30/2012 06:54 AM, Chris Little wrote: On 4/30/2012 4:39 AM, David Troidl wrote: Hi Chris, I'm certainly no expert on your TEI dictionaries, but wouldn't it make sense to have the first key be one that would sort properly, and present the

Re: [sword-devel] TEI formatting, duplicated key (BDB Glosses)

2012-04-30 Thread Jonathan Morgan
Hi DM, On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:00 AM, DM Smith dmsm...@crosswire.org wrote: On 04/30/2012 09:37 AM, Daniel Owens wrote: On 04/30/2012 06:54 AM, Chris Little wrote: On 4/30/2012 4:39 AM, David Troidl wrote: Hi Chris, I'm certainly no expert on your TEI dictionaries, but wouldn't it

[sword-devel] Versification scheme for a new Bible translation

2012-04-30 Thread Brian J Dumont
Hi all, I'm working with a Bible translator who has recently completed a Bible translation into the Tandroy language. I'm almost done converting his basic source into osis, and will soon be working on getting it into SWORD. The versification looks so far to be MT verses in KJV book order in

Re: [sword-devel] Versification scheme for a new Bible translation

2012-04-30 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Best to check which would be missing least. And then cram a few verses together, unless we can expect a whole lot of other texts in a similar versification. Peter Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:44:13 -0400 Von: Brian J Dumont brian.j.dum...@gmail.com An:

Re: [sword-devel] Versification scheme for a new Bible translation

2012-04-30 Thread David Haslam
Didn't Greg Hellings write a Perl script to check which of our defined v11ns would be the most suitable for a new module? David PS. Isn't the OT of the KJV based on the MT? If so, what's the real problem? PS2. During module build, please be careful. Unless the Zcomp problem has been solved

Re: [sword-devel] Versification scheme for a new Bible translation

2012-04-30 Thread Brian J Dumont
On 04/30/2012 12:10 PM, David Haslam wrote: PS. Isn't the OT of the KJV based on the MT? If so, what's the real problem? I had thought so as well; but compare KJV to JPS. There are a number of OT chapters where the JPS has many more verses (for example, Lev 5, Num 17) --

Re: [sword-devel] Versification scheme for a new Bible translation

2012-04-30 Thread Greg Hellings
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:10 AM, David Haslam dfh...@googlemail.com wrote: Didn't Greg Hellings write a Perl script to check which of our defined v11ns would be the most suitable for a new module? Python. How dare you suggest I would sully myself with Perl?! :P

Re: [sword-devel] Versification scheme for a new Bible translation

2012-04-30 Thread Chris Little
On 04/30/2012 07:44 AM, Brian J Dumont wrote: Hi all, I'm working with a Bible translator who has recently completed a Bible translation into the Tandroy language. I'm almost done converting his basic source into osis, and will soon be working on getting it into SWORD. The versification looks

Re: [sword-devel] lemma systems

2012-04-30 Thread Chris Little
On 04/30/2012 06:47 AM, Daniel Owens wrote: The related discussion about TEI markup and lexicon keys raises another issue: lemma systems. Currently the only defined lemma system is strong. It is easy to connect to, but we need to move beyond it. I have several questions: 1. Should we define new

Re: [sword-devel] TEI formatting, duplicated key (BDB Glosses)

2012-04-30 Thread DM Smith
On 04/30/2012 10:36 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote: Hi DM, On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:00 AM, DM Smith dmsm...@crosswire.org mailto:dmsm...@crosswire.org wrote: On 04/30/2012 09:37 AM, Daniel Owens wrote: On 04/30/2012 06:54 AM, Chris Little wrote: On 4/30/2012 4:39 AM,

Re: [sword-devel] TEI formatting, duplicated key (BDB Glosses)

2012-04-30 Thread Greg Hellings
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:25 PM, DM Smith dmsm...@crosswire.org wrote: On 04/30/2012 10:36 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote: Hi DM, On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:00 AM, DM Smith dmsm...@crosswire.org wrote: On 04/30/2012 09:37 AM, Daniel Owens wrote: On 04/30/2012 06:54 AM, Chris Little wrote:

Re: [sword-devel] Versification scheme for a new Bible translation

2012-04-30 Thread Brian J Dumont
On 04/30/2012 12:37 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:10 AM, David Haslamdfh...@googlemail.com wrote: Didn't Greg Hellings write a Perl script to check which of our defined v11ns would be the most suitable for a new module? Python. How dare you suggest I would sully myself

Re: [sword-devel] Versification scheme for a new Bible translation

2012-04-30 Thread Brian J Dumont
On 04/30/2012 12:47 PM, Chris Little wrote: On 04/30/2012 07:44 AM, Brian J Dumont wrote: Hi all, I'm working with a Bible translator who has recently completed a Bible translation into the Tandroy language. I'm almost done converting his basic source into osis, and will soon be working on

Re: [sword-devel] Versification scheme for a new Bible translation

2012-04-30 Thread Greg Hellings
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Brian J Dumont brian.j.dum...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/30/2012 12:37 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:10 AM, David Haslamdfh...@googlemail.com  wrote: Didn't Greg Hellings write a Perl script to check which of our defined v11ns would be

[sword-devel] FTBFS on Fedora/x86_64 [Was: Re: Versification scheme for a new Bible translation]

2012-04-30 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 30.4.2012 19:44, Greg Hellings wrote: They worked for me a few weeks ago, but I only ever build from SVN. With the ./configure line ./configure --enable-debug --enable-tests --enable-utilities --enable-examples --with-clucene=/usr --with-icusword on this more or less Fedora 17, I get

Re: [sword-devel] FTBFS on Fedora/x86_64 [Was: Re: Versification scheme for a new Bible translation]

2012-04-30 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 30/04/12 22:50, Matěj Cepl wrote: On 30.4.2012 19:44, Greg Hellings wrote: They worked for me a few weeks ago, but I only ever build from SVN. on this more or less Fedora 17, I get this error when running make on trunk: What I am doing wrong? You are using gcc-4.7. See attached

Re: [sword-devel] TEI formatting, duplicated key (BDB Glosses)

2012-04-30 Thread David Troidl
On 4/30/2012 7:54 AM, Chris Little wrote: On 4/30/2012 4:39 AM, David Troidl wrote: Hi Chris, I'm certainly no expert on your TEI dictionaries, but wouldn't it make sense to have the first key be one that would sort properly, and present the dictionary in true alphabetical order? I'm

Re: [sword-devel] Versification scheme for a new Bible translation

2012-04-30 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
On 04/30/2012 06:47 AM, Chris Little wrote: Sounds French. We don't really have enough information to produce this v11n system yet. The most important piece of information to know is that unless you build some flexibility into the system and refrain from ever hard coding the number of verses

Re: [sword-devel] FTBFS on Fedora/x86_64 [Was: Re: Versification scheme for a new Bible translation]

2012-04-30 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 30.4.2012 23:58, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: You are using gcc-4.7. See attached patch. Bindings are broken. I do not have a fix. Actually, silly me, after trying your patch, I made my brain think again, and I've realized that we have to have a patch in Fedora. Which we do ...