Just a thought - might this topic be worth discussing with the folk in the
Tyndale STEP http://crosswire.org/wiki/Frontends:TyndaleStep project?
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/seeking-consensus-on-OSIS-lemma-best-practice-tp4651158p4651180.html
I'm running 2741. I'd also be willing to do testing. All I need is OSIS
file and some sense of what to look for ...
~A
On Saturday, October 13, 2012, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
Luke, it would be very helpful if you could post a brief snippet of OSIS
that represents the problem you are having.
The OSIS schema is a bit convoluted how it allows two different document
models. I've been thinking that it might make sense to have three distinct OSIS
schemas. The one we have now would be one of the three. The other two would be
for the other two document models.
The problem I'm coming up
On Oct 14, 2012, at 9:19 PM, Daniel Owens dcowen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/14/2012 06:19 PM, DM Smith wrote:
The OSIS schema is a bit convoluted how it allows two different document
models. I've been thinking that it might make sense to have three distinct
OSIS schemas. The one we have now
In working on the ESV, catchWord is used a lot in notes to tie the note to the
text in the verse. I'm running into a problem with Exodus 3:14.
The input text I'm coming from is:
verse num=14
God said to Moses, “span class=divine-nameI am who I am/span.”note
class=alternativeOr span
It almost seems like having a regular schema is almost worthless. Due
to the desire for milestoneable objects, it will almost always be
trivial to produce valid OSIS documents that are not semantically
meaningful (e.g. 'Colorless green ideas sleep furiously'). Perhaps the
focus should be on
