On 03/01/2013, at 6:28 PM, Chris Little chris...@crosswire.org wrote:
At this point, I wouldn't recommend directing users to download from the beta
repository. We don't release new content to beta any longer and the content
that was reasonably good has long been moved to other repositories.
On 1/3/2013 4:03 AM, Nic Carter wrote:
On 03/01/2013, at 6:28 PM, Chris Little chris...@crosswire.org wrote:
At this point, I wouldn't recommend directing users to download from the beta
repository. We don't release new content to beta any longer and the content
that was reasonably good has
Done.
I made it available here only in response to this request ..
~A
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Chris Little chris...@crosswire.org wrote:
Andrew, this document is copyrighted. We do not have permission to
distribute it. You certainly and absolutely do not have permission to
I guess that answers the question posed by Nic then ..
These efforts are apparently on hold pending permission to distribute.
~A
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Thule thules...@gmail.com wrote:
Done.
I made it available here only in response to this request ..
~A
On Thu, Jan 3,
Once (if?) you obtain permission to distribute, please let the list know so
that volunteers can continue to move this effort forward. (Conversion from
a Word document may no longer be necessary).
~A
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Andrew Thule thules...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess that answers
Andrew, this is now quite enough. Please desist posting further onto our list.
Your presence is undesired
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: Andrew Thule thules...@gmail.com
To: SWORD Developersapos; Collaboration Forum sword-devel@crosswire.org
Subject: [sword-devel] ISV status?
Come now Peter, don't be so quick to find fault.
The Crosswire repository currently contains version 1.5 of the ISV module.
Nic's question was asking about the inclusion of the OT in that module.
The Crosswire site doesn't say anything about the status of this module,
and Nic's question seems to
I should add that prior to doing anything I did check the isv.conf file
which says this:
DistributionLicense=Copyrighted; Permission to distribute granted to
CrossWire
From .conf file at least, any reasonable person would conclude that
permission had already been obtained to distribute (and
I can see how you might conclude that.
However, when we get permission for a copyrighted work, we get permission for
that copyright. If the work is updated, there is a new copyright and we have to
obtain permission for that.
In Him,
DM
On Jan 3, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Andrew Thule
This site wasn't on my radar, but I find it very useful:
http://crosswire.org/wiki/Modules_in_the_beta_repository#Commentary_Modules
Many of these (well documented) issues appear easily fixed. For example
the 'emptyvss' issues are likely simple problems to fix. It appears the
purpose of this
Thanks for the clarification DM.
Perhaps for the sake of clarity then, the .conf file's
DistributionLicense= attribute could contain the version for which
permission was granted (rather than appearing to be generic).
~A
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, DM Smith dmsm...@crosswire.org wrote:
I
I just thought about this a bit more .. I suppose that's what Version=1.5
is for ...
Nevermind.
~A
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Andrew Thule thules...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the clarification DM.
Perhaps for the sake of clarity then, the .conf file's
DistributionLicense= attribute
If there are prohibitions against distributions of newer revisions of the
text, this needs to be documented somewhere; for how else will volunteers
know they are restricted to working with particular versions of text?
~A
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Andrew Thule thules...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Andrew Thule thules...@gmail.com wrote:
I just thought about this a bit more .. I suppose that's what Version=1.5
is for ...
No, the Copyright limitation applies to the source material. It's very
possible that multiple versions of the module could be made from
By and large, we use the upstream source for a text without modifying it at
all. If we find errors or problems, we feed them back upstream. This benefits
everyone, not just us.
When a source is not copyrighted, we look for the best source we can find. When
it is copyrighted we get it from the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.01.2013 09:22, Nic Carter wrote:
Thanks for these.
Hopefully some kind soul will apply them?
When I first posted the patches I thought I'll wait until 2013 before
taking any further steps. But it has been a very busy time for me and
On 03/01/13 20:46, Andrew Thule wrote:
If there are prohibitions against distributions of newer revisions of
the text, this needs to be documented somewhere; for how else will
volunteers know they are restricted to working with particular versions
of text?
You are no CrossWire volunteer.
On 04/01/2013, at 12:04 AM, Chris Little chris...@crosswire.org wrote:
The only repository not for general public use is not listed in
masterRepoList.conf, and that's the experimental repository.
The attic repositories are definitely intended for the public to use. If
users care to, they
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 18:51 -0500, Andrew Thule wrote:
Have you read [James 2:13]? It's not clear why the hostility, but I'm
trying to contribute here (albeit with lots of resistance).
Resistance comes about when someone with a severe case of stubbornness
ignores being told that a
On Thursday, January 3, 2013, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 18:51 -0500, Andrew Thule wrote:
Resistance comes about when someone with a severe case of stubbornness
ignores being told that a particular contribution is not desired, not
asked for nor even legal. Cases in point -
On 1/3/2013 12:30 PM, Andrew Thule wrote:
I should add that prior to doing anything I did check the isv.conf file
which says this:
DistributionLicense=Copyrighted; Permission to distribute granted to
CrossWire
From .conf file at least, any reasonable person would conclude that
permission had
21 matches
Mail list logo
