On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, ref...@gmx.net wrote:
Lexica in sword are not build with OSIS.
Ah, I think I see. Are you referring to the fact that they have to be
converted to IMP files first?
Thanks,
-
| Name: Tim
Sorry for the brief top-reply:
I believe we only accept new lexica in the TEI format.
http://crosswire.org/wiki/TEI_Dictionaries
I hope that helps! :)
On 25/08/2013, at 4:26 PM, Timothy S. Nelson wayl...@wayland.id.au wrote:
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, ref...@gmx.net wrote:
Lexica in sword are
Thanks Nic. Yes.
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: Nic Carter niccar...@mac.com
To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum sword-devel@crosswire.org
Subject: [sword-devel] Lexical fields
Date: Sun, Aug 25, 2013 07:11
Sorry for the brief top-reply:
I believe we only accept new
There are a few things being mixed up here:
Module driver type: RawLD, zLD, etc., specified in the module's .conf
ModDrv entry.
Source text MARKUP: OSIS, TEI, ThML, specified with the SourceType entry.
Import format: OSIS, 'Imp', VPL, etc. this only dictates which import
utility is
Hi
Can someone point me to a Bible that has 'chapter introductions'. I.e. not
Book introductions, nor testament introductions, but introductions for
chapter...
Do we have such modules at the moment?
Chris
___
sword-devel mailing list:
I'd like to finally push this out the door. Please let me know if you'd like
more time to get around to testing. I understand if things are busy. Otherwise,
if it continues to remain quiet, I'll take that for a positive sign that no one
has found any issues.
Troy A. Griffitts
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013, Nic Carter wrote:
Sorry for the brief top-reply:
I believe we only accept new lexica in the TEI format.
http://crosswire.org/wiki/TEI_Dictionaries
I hope that helps! :)
Yes, very much. Someone might want to update the the following
webpage:
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
There are a few things being mixed up here:
[snip]
Thanks for the clarification.
A TEI LocalOptionFilter to put TEI fields into EntryAttributes would allow
any TEI field to be searching on with SWORD. We just need a rich modules to
I think I'm happy with the present state of the library.
I would recommend including my last commit (r2970), which cleans up some
abbreviations/aliases that we no longer need. And your SWVersion stuff
might deserve a ChangeLog entry.
--Chris
On 08/25/2013 11:24 AM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
