On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 19:07 -0800, Chris Little wrote:
I haven't looked at the code, but the idea of mapping between
versification systems (not versifications of particular translations but
versification systems, as we define them) is completely ridiculous.
Teus has already given a use
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 19:07 -0800, Chris Little wrote:
Maybe with v11n mappings it is the same situation?
I would assume this requires a change to function signatures, so it's
not going to appear in 1.7.x at all.
I do not think that this is what Kostya asked for, just that his patch
will
These repositories have now been merged, as we discussed. avraw (av11n)
has been merged into raw (main) and the atticraw (the attic repository)
has the prior version of each module that was overwritten.
The av repositories themselves have been emptied, but left in place.
masterRepoList.conf
Chris has also updated the wiki page (thanks).
http://crosswire.org/wiki/Module_Repositories
Xiphos users may wish to take the opportunity to prune the two empty repos
from the Module Manager.
(I just did so.)
David
--
View this message in context:
A reminder for front-end developers who hosted their projects on Google Code.
http://google-opensource.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/a-change-to-google-code-download-service.html
The change is as from TODAY (15 January). It concerns downloads.
This will impact a few of our projects, such as
* And
On 1/15/2014 12:31 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 19:07 -0800, Chris Little wrote:
I haven't looked at the code, but the idea of mapping between
versification systems (not versifications of particular translations but
versification systems, as we define them) is completely
I think we still need to try.
If I had a bunch of paper Bibles that had different v11ns and (presuming I
could read the variety of languages) sat down to line them up, I would find
that it is hard because it is in front of me. If I were a novice, I might be
royally confused, but that would be
On 15 Jan 2014 15:13, Chris Little chris...@crosswire.org wrote:
On 1/15/2014 12:31 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 19:07 -0800, Chris Little wrote:
I haven't looked at the code, but the idea of mapping between
versification systems (not versifications of particular
Verse numbers were introduced much later into the canonical text.
They were intended for convenience.
When displaying material in parallel, it's good to focus, not on the verse
numbers, which are secondary, but on the original caonnical content.
A good front-end correctly display this content
On 1/15/2014 3:51 PM, Daniel Owens wrote:
I agree. From a strategic point of view, I think it makes sense to place
a priority on mapping between KJV, NRSV, and Leningrad, but then LXX is
important too. Even if it is only approximate, there are some places
where it is very simple (most of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
