Dear Baiju,
It would be sensible to contact my friend Yesudas S Solomon at
http://wordofgod.in/
and to ask whether he has already converted this text to a SWORD module.
Of all the people among my worldwide contacts, he is the one who is most
likely to be able
to advise about the provenance and
Chris Little wrote a Python script which for another Wikisource Bible text,
imports the text into an intermediate format (USFM).
He observes that every Bible text he's seen as a Wikisource edition has its
own peculiar idiosyncrasies.
A one-size-fits-all script would be impossible to manage.
I do not want to blame anyone. About deficiencies we shall speak calmly,
expecting calmly constructive relationship. As long as we can not to hear
each other i see no other way but to talk about one but in different words.
For now whole development process is dependent on two people who have
On 2/25/2014 2:15 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:15:03AM +0100, Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
In essence, if the module is of the kind as this one - ancient and
clearly with problems, chances are that the module needs to be
recreated from scratch anyway. Find a decent source and
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:17:24AM -0800, Chris Little wrote:
It's unclear whether you are working entirely from an ODT
exported from Wikisource articles or are also using the CzeBKR
module exported via osis2mod, but there's no way we would
distribute content produced via either of these
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 06:58:26PM +1100, Nic Carter wrote:
I then need to manually merge things when SWORD is updated.
git svn rebase
Matěj
--
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mceplatceplovi.cz
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
My opinions may have
On Feb 25, 2014, at 6:10 PM, Stephan Kreutzer skreut...@freiebibel.de wrote:
The original, printed KJV is difficult to pin down. It certainly is not the
1611. That's easy to show. When I started working on it, the claim was that
it was the 1769 edition. I've not been able to find such an
Look guys, if you only read and consider any of my emails in their
entirely, make it this one.
1) I don't hate DVCS.
2) I believe git is the dominant opensource DVCS (nb: 'D') winner and
choice.
3) I have never said we WON'T switch to git at some time.
4) I have never said that SVN is
If you were after a tool to foster collaboration/tracking of patches, etc.
then Atlassian's Crucible is possibly the best one on the market for that.
You can then review commits or patches, branches, etc. People can upload
patches which you can then view against the source code.
It has a VERY and
