Thanks Ryan,
I imagine some SWORD developers are competent in using Python under CygWin
as well as on Linux.
When I tried u2o.py last week, it bombed out at the first line:
#!/usr/bin/python3
This line seems to be particular to your current Linux system and chosen
Python interpreter.
Should I
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 06:03:09AM -0700, David Haslam wrote:
Thanks Ryan,
I imagine some SWORD developers are competent in using Python under CygWin
as well as on Linux.
When I tried u2o.py last week, it bombed out at the first line:
#!/usr/bin/python3
This line seems to be
That path is correct, you'll just need to use your package manager to
install Python 3.x instead of the default Python, which is typically still
on the 2.7 series.
On Aug 4, 2015 8:06 AM, David Haslam dfh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks Ryan,
I imagine some SWORD developers are competent in
The issue is the top layer of the repository view, which is just languages.
Underneath those will be nested the works themselves to arbitrary size.
Allocating eight thousand will be sufficient unless a large number of extra
languages (a la Klingon, Esperanto, etc) are added. But handling it
Indeed, only the top layer and only per one repo.
Sent from my phone. Apologies for brevity and typos.On 5 Aug 2015 5:35 am, Greg
Hellings greg.helli...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue is the top layer of the repository view, which is just languages.
Underneath those will be nested the works
This is forward thinking, but not too far off...
7000 includes only 1 work per language. If you expand the thinking to
include commentaries, devotions, dictionaries, and genbooks... 16 bit
(65,000) might be a good total allowance for the next decade, but 24 bit
(16,000,000) or more is the goal.
We are currently in the midst of the work of conversion of a very large
collection of Bible texts and creation of a new repo.
The repo will have in excess of 600 Bibles.
Interestingly this triggers a bug in Xiphos, which had made the at one
time probably reasonable assumption that no repo will
On 08/04/2015 06:07 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Interestingly this triggers a bug in Xiphos, which had made the at one
time probably reasonable assumption that no repo will have more than
200 languages.
I've committed a change to make that 2000 for now, but I'll re-work the
code so that it's
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 06:03 -0700, David Haslam wrote:
Thanks Ryan,
I imagine some SWORD developers are competent in using Python under CygWin
as well as on Linux.
When I tried u2o.py last week, it bombed out at the first line:
#!/usr/bin/python3
This line seems to be particular to
1000 languages is too low. That barrier
will be broken within a year. 2000 might last over a year. Maybe.
We are shooting for over 7,000.
On 08/04/2015 12:24 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
On 08/04/2015
06:07 PM, Peter von Kaehne
Title: signature
Yes, it is pretty easy to crash Xiphos,
right now. Oops.
For testing purposes, the repo under construction is:
Repository name: eBible.org
Access method: FTP
Server and directory: eBible.org/pub/sword
User name: anonymous
11 matches
Mail list logo
