On 02/10/2016 08:27 AM, David Haslam wrote:
> Are month heading keys valid with the key $$$mm.00 ?
A daily.dev is a dictionary module with odd keys. You can encode
$$$mm.00 if you wish, and if you display that daily.dev in an app's
usual dictionary pane, you can surely navigate to mm.00. But I'm
So would the solution to include month headings (etc.) be to go to a proper
OSIS XML source file, rather than to use IMP with either ThML or OSIS
fragments?
I'm thinking of the original twelve subtitles, such as
JANUARY
THIS IS MY BELOVED SON, IN WHOM I AM WELL PLEASED. HEAR YE HIM.
If it is added, how would the front-end use it?
Bible Desktop automatically goes to the current date in the user’s default
daily devotional upon startup. Would it show the intro on the first of the
month? With every day of the month?
Having it in the first day entry ensures that it is seen.
See http://crosswire.org/wiki/DevTools:Modules#IMP_Format
For daily devotionals, you must encode the key as "$$$mm.dd".
Question: Are month heading keys valid with the key $$$mm.00 ?
And is a general introduction feasible under the key $$$00.00 ?
i.e. By analogy with the way IMP format
Simple enough:
One would put a month heading in mm.01 as a heading using the proper markup for
the module whether ThML, TEI, OSIS, …
Every dictionary supports a module introduction. It is an unsorted first entry.
I have no idea how one specifies that the first key of the module is an intro.
> On Feb 10, 2016, at 9:00 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
>
> On 02/10/2016 08:27 AM, David Haslam wrote:
>> Are month heading keys valid with the key $$$mm.00 ?
> A daily.dev is a dictionary module with odd keys. You can encode $$$mm.00 if
> you wish, and if you display that
David is right though, a intro would be a suitable thing in so many way and
many use it. E.g. the Herrnhuther Losungen come with a year's losung and a
month's one and a monthly psalm., So using the chapter/verses 0 logic from
bibles does make sense.
Sent from my phone. Apologies for brevity
What type of unicode are they?
I assume UTF-8. Are there modules having other types (chinese, japan, etc.)?
Manfred
> Am 09.02.2016 um 22:06 schrieb Peter von Kaehne :
>
> Re the first question, i would treat any report re a new module not being
> unicode as a bug report
>
>
Yes. UTF-8.
SWORD modules are either CP1252 (MS Windows extended version of Latin-1) or
UTF-8.
7-bit ASCII is both of these. But going forward should be marked as UTF-8.
> On Feb 10, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Manfred Bergmann
> wrote:
>
> What type of unicode are they?
> I
Jaak,
I don’t understand your HTTP-only comment regarding the wiki. It works just
fine under HTTPS. Is your objection the self-signed certificate?
In Him,
DM
> On Feb 9, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Jaak Ristioja wrote:
>
> On 08.02.2016 13:35, David Haslam wrote:
>>
> Am 09.02.2016 um 22:52 schrieb David Haslam :
>
> Having ICU, but lacking a suitable Unicode font for aspects of a writing
> system is another thing.
AFAIK TrueType fonts are available.
> Having a source text supplied in a non-Unicode font is a challenge.
> Suppose
I think, Karl, this depends very much on the set of devotions - some of the more liturgical churches will have probably run one aspect in a daily repeated way. I mentioned the Losungen and I think having the monthly one appear the whole month, the yearly one the whole year does make sense. For
For GenBook there is DisplayLevel, which addresses the display of the selected
key and some number of parents.
There are the following modules having it:
concord.conf:DisplayLevel=1
fregbm.conf:DisplayLevel=1
geraugustinus.conf:DisplayLevel=2
lawgospel.conf:DisplayLevel=2
Putting it in mm.01 implies that it only belongs to the first of the month.
In the 1842 original these headings were at the top of each month's table.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/IMP-format-for-Daily-Devotionals-tp4656074p4656085.html
Sent
Structurally it sounds very akin to the idea that has occasionally
been asked for, to allow commentaries in a gen-book layout. Within the
commentary you might have a nesting such as
New Testament
- Gospels
-- Luke
--- Birth of Christ
Magnificat
- Luke 1:50
The commentary might include
Manfred,
I have a local friend who serves as a volunteer for MissionAssist (formerly
known as Wycliffe Associates UK).
He has experience of recovering Bible translations from Amiga 3" diskettes,
that were thought to have been lost forever because the media was no longer
supported by hardware or
On 02/10/2016 12:23 PM, David Haslam wrote:
> Putting it in mm.01 implies that it only belongs to the first of the month.
> In the 1842 original these headings were at the top of each month's table.
It seems to me that this is a sort of semantic gap between original
paper publication and how the
sword.pw = 8 characters
sword.Bible = 11 characters
crosswire.org = 13 characters
crosswire.Bible = 15 characters
See
http://www.nic.bible/blog/post/when-can-.bible-domain-names-be-registered#.VruHEnUrKho
for registration opening information.
I think it was hugely important for a while.
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2016 um 20:51 Uhr
> Von: "David Haslam"
> An: sword-devel@crosswire.org
> Betreff: Re: [sword-devel] FYI new TLD
>
> go.bible = 8 characters!
>
> Even so, my inherited project is rather past
go.bible = 8 characters!
Even so, my inherited project is rather past its peak in terms of market
demand.
Displaced by apps on smart phones.
Notwithstanding, I messaged Jolon Faichney with the idea.
David
--
View this message in context:
> On Feb 10, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Jaak Ristioja wrote:
>
> On 10.02.2016 19:00, DM Smith wrote:
>> I don’t understand your HTTP-only comment regarding the wiki. It works just
>> fine under HTTPS. Is your objection the self-signed certificate?
>
> I object to sending my login
On 10.02.2016 19:00, DM Smith wrote:
> I don’t understand your HTTP-only comment regarding the wiki. It works just
> fine under HTTPS. Is your objection the self-signed certificate?
I object to sending my login credentials over the wire in plain text.
Btw, the wiki login form didn't redirect to
Jack,
OK - I understand - I just updated the link for you.
Blessings!
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Please-update-the-link-here-if-you-have-migrated-your-project-tp4656032p4656070.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Link just added for xulsword issues.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Please-update-the-link-here-if-you-have-migrated-your-project-tp4656032p4656071.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks for the heads-up.
Were we to register and use, we'd end up having to use 6 more keys to type
the URL.
One thing for sure, the new TLD will be blocked by regimes hostile to the
Gospel of Christ.
Having such a TLD makes it easier to block than by examining content.
That could be a huge
".bible" http://bibletld.org
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
I’ll be working on upgrading the wiki to a more recent version. When I do,
it’ll be down and/or locked. I’ll try to keep it to a minimum.
Hopefully when it is done, login will require HTTPS.
In Him,
DM
___
sword-devel mailing list:
27 matches
Mail list logo