Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

They will be reissued Sent from my phone. Apologies for brevity and typos.On 11 Mar 2016 9:25 pm, yvand wrote: > > What about modules have been already released, such as FreJND? > FreJND needs a proper versification scheme. It would be great to use the > new

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

I think so, yes. Sent from my phone. Apologies for brevity and typos.On 12 Mar 2016 2:27 am, DM Smith wrote: > > Found them attached in an earlier email. There are 3 canon files, segond, > darbyfr and calvin. Are we doing all 3? > > I'm working on adding them to

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

Found them attached in an earlier email. There are 3 canon files, segond, darbyfr and calvin. Are we doing all 3? I'm working on adding them to JSword. In Him, DM > On Mar 11, 2016, at 8:22 PM, DM Smith wrote: > > Where can I find the canon_*.h files? > > In Him, >

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

Where can I find the canon_*.h files? In Him, DM > On Mar 11, 2016, at 3:00 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > > This is just to say as no one has voiced any objections to domcox' s French > versifications i will now actively use these if suitable modules are > submitted.

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

What about modules have been already released, such as FreJND? FreJND needs a proper versification scheme. It would be great to use the new versification /canon_darbyfr.h/ after frontends updates. Le 11/03/2016 09:00, Peter von Kaehne a écrit : > This is just to say as no one has voiced any

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

Ok this page https://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Survey_of_versification_schemes_in_French_Bibles#Canons_proposals_for_The_Sword_Project doesn’t affect the Catholic french Bible. It's particular of protestant bibles. For the Catholic Bibles the Catholic and Catholic2 versification can be enough.

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

Ok Merci ! Le 11/03/2016 14:49, Michael H a écrit : https://www.crosswire.org/wiki On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Fr Cyrille > wrote: OK but where can I found the developer's wiki? Le 11/03/2016 12:01, David Haslam a écrit :

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

https://www.crosswire.org/wiki On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Fr Cyrille wrote: > OK but where can I found the developer's wiki? > > > Le 11/03/2016 12:01, David Haslam a écrit : > >> They are documented in the developers' wiki. >> >> Follow the Versification category.

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

OK but where can I found the developer's wiki? Le 11/03/2016 12:01, David Haslam a écrit : They are documented in the developers' wiki. Follow the Versification category. David -- View this message in context:

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

They are documented in the developers' wiki. Follow the Versification category. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/1-8-French-versifications-modules-tp4656199p4656202.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[sword-devel] Section headings in USFM in the book of Psalms

When USFM is converted to OSIS, section headings are converted to div elements. In most books of the Bible, this works out fine, even when the div element spans across chapter ends. That's usually what the translator intended (even though he/she wasn't consciously thinking in terms of XML). In

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

Hi Peter, I'm not sure to understand very well what you say, but if you send me a like where to read this french specification (domcox' s??) I can give you my opinion about this type of versification. Major french bible are Catholic, than I can verify all of this... Le 11/03/2016 09:00,

[sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

This is just to say as no one has voiced any objections to domcox' s French versifications i will now actively use these if suitable modules are submitted. These will be marked as requiring version 1.8 which quite clearly is not yet released, but i think is stable enough dossing about in svn.