On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 15:56 -0400, DM Smith wrote:
> As noted SwordWeb has its own copy of the repository. Troy maintains
> that copy.
And that copy is similar but not identical to the standard one - in
both directions.
Peter
___
sword-devel mailing
As noted SwordWeb has its own copy of the repository. Troy maintains that copy.
— DM
> On May 2, 2016, at 1:08 PM, David Haslam wrote:
>
> Now that Greg has identified the cause, might it be possible for someone to
> make these modules available for use with The Bible
Now that Greg has identified the cause, might it be possible for someone to
make these modules available for use with The Bible Tool on our server?
Best regards,
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/The-Bible-Tool-missing-modules-tp4656282p4656286.html
My bad, I thought you were implying it was from a non-CrossWire source
repository.
/space/home/swordweb/webmods/badchars/ukjv.conf
That version is the version 1.1 of the conf file. The current version
for download is 1.1.1 with the version notes reading
"History_1.1.1=Corrected .conf encoding
UKJV is in the main CrossWire repo!
Why does it appear to be missing in the list of Bible modules offered by The
Bible Tool on the CrossWire server?
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/The-Bible-Tool-missing-modules-tp4656282p4656284.html
Sent from
AFAIK the point of the tool is just to give online access. If
repositories outside of the official CrossWire one would like to
expose their modules through the study tool, they can stand it up and
run it on their own host.
--Greg
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:37 AM, David Haslam
One of my contacts has asked why (for example) the Bible module UKJV does not
appear in the list of modules for The Bible Tool.
This prompts the general question: What determines which modules are
offered?
How many modules are missing from our online example of The Bible Tool?