Re: [sword-devel] Bishop for Android 1.0.8

Thank you for the update, Troy. I don't think waiting will do any good, and will only do harm. You see, "Crosswire Bible Society" is not eligible for a D-U-N-S number according to https://developer.apple.com/support/D-U-N-S/ because it is a trade name, but not a full corporation. Frankly, I

Re: [sword-devel] Bishop for Android 1.0.8

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018, 20:26 Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > Thank you for the feedback Michael and reporting back. I am trying to > get my Apple account converted or an 'Organization' so 'CrossWire' can > submit Bishop to the AppStore, but I've stopped receiving responses from

Re: [sword-devel] Bishop for Android 1.0.8

Thank you for the feedback Michael and reporting back.  I am trying to get my Apple account converted or an 'Organization' so 'CrossWire' can submit Bishop to the AppStore, but I've stopped receiving responses from D about adding a physical street address to our P.O.Box, which is what they require

Re: [sword-devel] Android common module storage location

DM, It sounds like (I think confirmed by both Martin and Karl) AndBible looks in its private location and also /sdcard/jsword/ for modules.  If you are able, might you consider adding /sdcard/sword/ to AndBible's search path? Troy On 04/30/2018 05:49 PM, DM Smith wrote: > Apparently Troy found

Re: [sword-devel] Android common module storage location

I found that location, as per swordstubb.cpp in jni bindings Android/data/net.bible.android.activity/files as mentioned in my original note...but it had been empty and my brain fart was that I had to remember that this device is new and AndBible hadn't been run yet so of course nothing was there

Re: [sword-devel] Android common module storage location

Apparently Troy found a way to search for repositories and use them. AndBible requests a standard storage location from the Android API and uses that. The path is specific to AndBible. I’ll check w Troy to see what he has done. Martin is unable by current job to work on AndBible. I’m trying to

Re: [sword-devel] Android common module storage location

No. I installed modules on AndBible only and Bishop finds all of them. No duplication. On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 4:20 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > Is there no one who has modules seen on Android by both AndBible and > Bishop? > Does everyone duplicate modules? > >

Re: [sword-devel] Android common module storage location

Is there no one who has modules seen on Android by both AndBible and Bishop? Does everyone duplicate modules? ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change

Re: [sword-devel] Difference of linkEntry() method between RawCom and RawCom4 classes

Ping. On 17.04.2018 01:13, Jaak Ristioja wrote: > Hello! > > In yet another effort to deduplicate some code in Sword++, I stumbled > upon the following difference between the RawCom and RawCom4 classes: > > -void RawCom::linkEntry(const SWKey *inkey) { > +void RawCom4::linkEntry(const SWKey

Re: [sword-devel] Installing Sword-Web

Hi Vince, Peter has recently attempted to install SWORDWeb for a church.  Last I heard he was almost to the end, but had one last issue he was dealing with.  Maybe he will let us know if he was successful and what issues he had to work around which weren't clear from the instructions. I'm happy

Re: [sword-devel] ICU 61.1

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018, 16:07 Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Yeah, I saw a few messages on sword-support about it too. > > We have some convoluted logic in there to include different headers > depending on if it ICU is really old or only kindof old. We probably just

[sword-devel] Installing Sword-Web

Hello gentlemen, Is there someone who would be willing to help walk me through installing Sword-Web? I've tried installing it twice (just finished my second attempt) and so far, no dice. I have it on an isolated VPS on a subdomain. Thanks, Vince LaRue

Re: [sword-devel] ICU 61.1

Hi Greg, Yeah, I saw a few messages on sword-support about it too. We have some convoluted logic in there to include different headers depending on if it ICU is really old or only kindof old.  We probably just need to update that logic for 61.1.  Any idea when it might roll out to a Fedora

[sword-devel] ICU 61.1

There have been several people reporting that SWORD is not compatible with ICU4C 61.1 as it's begun to make its way into various distribution repositories. Fedora Rawhide (continuous rolling "broken" release) has just taken that plunge today and now I'm getting the same build failures. Troy -

Re: [sword-devel] What on earth is a Strong’s ID augmentation identifier?

David Instone-Brewer of STEP Bible kindly explained as follows: OpenScriptures has aligned Strongs to BDB but this required dividing about 800 words into two or more separate words. They did this by adding "a", "b" etc to the Strongs numbers. In Crosswire OSIS this is separated from the number