Re: [sword-devel] Module upload: TurNTB

2019-01-07 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Cyrille - please send me your SSH key. I will make you part of the module team completely so that we can share texts etc. Peter On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 20:46 +0100, Cyrille wrote: > The cross-references are not usable. David proposed to use orefs.py > to > adjust it. I can help if necessary. > >

Re: [sword-devel] Module upload: TurNTB

2019-01-07 Thread David Haslam
That would be very helpful. Currently, I have a lot of other work keeping me busy. David Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 19:46, Cyrille wrote: > The cross-references are not usable. David proposed to use orefs.py to > adjust it. I can help if necessary. > > Il 07/01/2019

Re: [sword-devel] Module upload: TurNTB

2019-01-07 Thread Cyrille
The cross-references are not usable. David proposed to use orefs.py to adjust it. I can help if necessary. Il 07/01/2019 20:34, ref...@host.crosswire.org ha scritto: > Dear All, > This is to announce that we have just now uploaded TurNTB. > This is is an updated version of TurNTB. > Many thanks

[sword-devel] Module upload: TurNTB

2019-01-07 Thread refdoc
Dear All, This is to announce that we have just now uploaded TurNTB. This is is an updated version of TurNTB. Many thanks to David for the hard work. yours The Module Team P.S.: This email is sent automatically on upload of a new/updated module ___

[sword-devel] Module upload: TurNTB

2019-01-07 Thread refdoc
Dear All, This is to announce that we have just now uploaded TurNTB. This is is an updated version of TurNTB. Many thanks to David for the hard work. yours The Module Team P.S.: This email is sent automatically on upload of a new/updated module ___

[sword-devel] Module upload: SomKQA

2019-01-07 Thread refdoc
Dear All, This is to announce that we have just now uploaded SomKQA. This is is an updated version of SomKQA. Many thanks to update for the hard work. yours The Module Team P.S.: This email is sent automatically on upload of a new/updated module ___

Re: [sword-devel] Short/Long Bible & Commentary Modules

2019-01-07 Thread Peter von Kaehne
> ArmEastern > Chamorro > Cro > CzeB21 > Est > GerAlbrecht > GerGruenewald > GerTafel > GerTextbibel > Leeser > ManxGaelic > SweKarlXII > Tyndale > VietLCCMN > Vulgate_HebPs > Wulfila > Wycliffe > > The following CrossWire commentaries also have a non-problematic > short OT index: > MAK >

[sword-devel] Module upload: Wycliffe

2019-01-07 Thread refdoc
Dear All, This is to announce that we have just now uploaded Wycliffe. This is is an updated version of Wycliffe. Many thanks to David for the hard work. yours The Module Team P.S.: This email is sent automatically on upload of a new/updated module

[sword-devel] Module upload: TurHADI

2019-01-07 Thread refdoc
Dear All, This is to announce that we have just now uploaded TurHADI. This is is an updated version of TurHADI. Many thanks to update for the hard work. yours The Module Team P.S.: This email is sent automatically on upload of a new/updated module

Re: [sword-devel] Short/Long Bible & Commentary Modules

2019-01-07 Thread Peter von Kaehne
On Tue, 2019-01-01 at 13:22 -0500, DM Smith wrote: > > The CrossWire Bible modules that have a visible NT problem having 2 > extra verses: (All are KJV, but maybe should be NRSV av11n) > HebDelitzsch > PorAlmeida1911 > PolUGdanska > Shona > TurHADI I have just now reissued the above modules.

[sword-devel] Module upload: PorAlmeida1911

2019-01-07 Thread refdoc
Dear All, This is to announce that we have just now uploaded PorAlmeida1911. This is is an updated version of PorAlmeida1911. Many thanks to update for the hard work. yours The Module Team P.S.: This email is sent automatically on upload of a new/updated module

[sword-devel] Module upload: Shona

2019-01-07 Thread refdoc
Dear All, This is to announce that we have just now uploaded Shona. This is is an updated version of Shona. Many thanks to update for the hard work. yours The Module Team P.S.: This email is sent automatically on upload of a new/updated module ___

[sword-devel] Module upload: PorAlmeida1911

2019-01-07 Thread refdoc
Dear All, This is to announce that we have just now uploaded PorAlmeida1911. This is is an updated version of PorAlmeida1911. Many thanks to update for the hard work. yours The Module Team P.S.: This email is sent automatically on upload of a new/updated module

[sword-devel] Module upload: HebDelitzsch

2019-01-07 Thread refdoc
Dear All, This is to announce that we have just now uploaded HebDelitzsch. This is is an updated version of HebDelitzsch. Many thanks to update for the hard work. yours The Module Team P.S.: This email is sent automatically on upload of a new/updated module

Re: [sword-devel] Remarks before [ModuleName] ?

2019-01-07 Thread David Haslam
Does that mean that Peter’s confmaker script should aim to detect these and fix them where required? David Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 14:55, DM Smith wrote: > tI’m pretty sure earlier versions of JSword expect [name] to be the first > line in the file and have no

Re: [sword-devel] PocketSword search indices

2019-01-07 Thread DM Smith
I think I’ve narrowed down the problem. More later. — DM Smith From my phone. Brief. Weird autocorrections. > On Jan 6, 2019, at 10:05 AM, DM Smith wrote: > > Nic is in the process of moving and that might affect his availability. > > I’ve PocketSword and access to the logs. I’ll look to

Re: [sword-devel] Remarks before [ModuleName] ?

2019-01-07 Thread DM Smith
I’m pretty sure earlier versions of JSword expect [name] to be the first line in the file and have no leading or trailing whitespace or other stuff. BOM will definitely goof it up. I’ve rewritten it to be compliant w this ini standard. But not all frontend have been updated or d/l by end

[sword-devel] Module upload: PolUGdanska

2019-01-07 Thread refdoc
Dear All, This is to announce that we have just now uploaded PolUGdanska. This is is an updated version of PolUGdanska. Many thanks to David for the hard work. yours The Module Team P.S.: This email is sent automatically on upload of a new/updated module

Re: [sword-devel] Module upload: SpaRV1865

2019-01-07 Thread Peter von Kaehne
On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 13:29 +, David Haslam wrote: > Wow! That was quick! That was the whole point of getting things automatised - whatever the various flaws on the way are or were - I am now at a place where I need a few minutes of time and peace and can do it very fast. Peter

Re: [sword-devel] Module upload: SpaRV1865

2019-01-07 Thread David Haslam
Wow! That was quick! Many thanks. David Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 13:18, wrote: > Dear All, > This is to announce that we have just now uploaded SpaRV1865. > This is is an updated version of SpaRV1865. > Many thanks to David for the hard work. > > yours > > The

[sword-devel] Module upload: SpaRV1865

2019-01-07 Thread refdoc
Dear All, This is to announce that we have just now uploaded SpaRV1865. This is is an updated version of SpaRV1865. Many thanks to David for the hard work. yours The Module Team P.S.: This email is sent automatically on upload of a new/updated module

Re: [sword-devel] Remarks before [ModuleName] ?

2019-01-07 Thread David Haslam
Thanks Greg, DM - does the same hold for JSword ? Background: .conf file for module FreBDM1707 has lots of remark lines, with 3 at the top of the file before the [ModuleName]. Aside: I imagine this is because Cyrille uses a template that he himself created. David Sent from ProtonMail Mobile

Re: [sword-devel] Remarks before [ModuleName] ?

2019-01-07 Thread Greg Hellings
There aren't any frontends that read conf files that I'm aware of. They all use the library to do that. The question is if the library can handle ini files with comments. A few basic tests should allow you to figure that out. --Greg On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 4:04 AM David Haslam wrote: > Are