Hi David,
He's not speaking about the xiphos repo, but xiphos in the ubuntu
official repo. Ubuntu 20.04 used the debian testing and xiphos was
removed from testing because of an obsolete dependancy.
Le 04/05/2020 à 20:59, David Haslam a écrit :
> If it were down momentarily, it’s already back up.
The Short answer about the OSIS spec tho
For now, I've been coding the PDF -> text -> USFM intending to ultimately
convert it to either markdown or OSIS for longterm maintenance. markdown if
UBS maintains it, and OSIS if it's maintained at Crosswire.
But my work in progress is:
1. What I mean by 'encoding' a copy (for my own use originally, but after
trying to find the list of corrections... i'm on this thread thinking the
work needs to be shared.)
Problem:
The PDF has issues when you try to copy tabular information.. it was not
generated to be reused digitally at all..
I’m using PocketSword.
The NASB module has no downloadable search index so I can’t do a direct
comparison.
I therefore used the same two words to search the NETfree module with scope
limited to Matthew.
It found only 7 verses containing both words. The nearest is 9:22
I can send a screenshot
Dear Tobias,
I have spent a bit of time documenting this a bit better in trunk and
have added a new flag (SEARCHFLAG_STRICTBOUNDARIES) to turn off the
default behavior to use a sliding window to find results.
When performing a multiword (non-indexed) search with the NASB using
your 2 terms, I
FWIW, there is a public archive of OSIS standard information at
https://ebible.org/osis/, but it is not being edited or improved in any way. It
just documents what the standard was when it was last officially maintained.
On 5/4/20 8:24 AM, David Haslam wrote:
> Have you looked at our Wiki page?
If it were down momentarily, it’s already back up.
David
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 19:57, David Haslam wrote:
> Why do you think it were removed rather than just being temporarily down ?
>
> It was OK yesterday.
>
> I expect Karl will have it back up in a jiffy.
>
>
Why do you think it were removed rather than just being temporarily down ?
It was OK yesterday.
I expect Karl will have it back up in a jiffy.
Aside: Some VPN services don’t allow FTP access to the Xiphos org repo, but
that’s not today’s issue.
AFAIK, you were asking only about the repo.
On 5/4/20 6:10 PM, DM Smith wrote:
> With the underlying lucene mechanism
He said he's doing multiword search (-2), not lucene search (-4).
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Have you looked at our Wiki page?
OSIS 211 CR
It was even edited again today!
The Bible Technologies Group has not met for years & the original website went
AWOL.
It may well be the case that CrossWire is the only remaining de facto
maintainer of OSIS.
Best regards,
David
Sent from
Clarification:
I use AND and OR all the time. Hints are in the Xiphos docs, if I
recall, but the boolean operators need to be capitalized and nothing
else capitalized. To search for a phrase, use quotes. Otherwise each
word is OR'd with the others. Forgetting to capitalize and can lead to
With the underlying lucene mechanism you can set the connector to OR or to AND.
I believe that OR is the default. With ranked search this works well.
In Him,
DM
> On May 4, 2020, at 4:15 PM, Tobias Klein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have the impression that the SWORD multi word search is
Ah, I have tried the latest release (there hasn't been an update since
first public availability, but there have been a number of revisions in
testing for a while now) on Bishop on Android and it generally shows
these verses correctly with footnotes on and in "Language Assist" mode,
which
Hi Tobias,
This should be documented a bit better, but I believe we have a
configurable verse window which is searched, which I believe defaults to
2 verses. The thinking behind this is that occasionally, verse
divisions artificially separate a common clause-- often breaking up a
single sentence
Sorry Troy. Multitasking..
It's NASB only with Strong's Numbers on.
On Mon, May 4, 2020, 07:08 Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Dear Jason,
>
> I am having a difficult time understand what you are reporting.
>
> You are showing English. NA28 is Greek.
>
> Mark 8:18, 19, and 20 all show fine for me.
Hi,
I have the impression that the SWORD multi word search is returning some
results that actually do not seem to match the search term.
For example when searching for the term "faith Jesus" in the NASB module
I get 86 results.
The first result that seems invalid is Matthew 9:28:
^28 When
Can you clarify what you mean by “I’m encoding the entire spec for storage in a
source form….”?
What has happened so far is that we’ve been responding with the 2006 2.1.1
version of the OSIS Spec. We host the file at
https://crosswire.org/osis/OSIS%202.1.1%20User%20Manual%2006March2006.pdf
David,
That page you refer to is the problem that created this email.
The page you refer to shouldn't exist like it does.. that information
should be going onto a problem ticket system. (Think the 'issue tracker' on
the USFM 3 list. It's searchable and the status of most items is clear,
and
Le 04/05/2020 à 20:50, Israel Dahl a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Why was Xiphos removed from the repositories?
Because we released to late... For now you can use my ppa for focal:
https://launchpad.net/~lafricain79/+archive/ubuntu/lafricaintest
Keep in touch with us, they probably offer the new release in
Hi,
Why was Xiphos removed from the repositories?
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
I've got 40 works and growing that I've been meaning to look at creating
Sword Modules. All of these are genbooks. Almost 100% currently are works
by Andrew Murray (but the list is much bigger.)
But, as I try to make sense of the OSIS spec, I'm facing a 2006 spec in not
very well done PDF, and
Dear Jason,
I am having a difficult time understand what you are reporting.
You are showing English. NA28 is Greek.
Mark 8:18, 19, and 20 all show fine for me.
Could you give us more information?
Troy
On 5/3/20 3:59 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> Greetings,
> After seeing the previous posts on
On 5/4/20 2:46 AM, David Haslam wrote:
> It might have been preferable for each volunteer in the CrossWire
> modules team to have had a period to test the module for free before
> it was released.
Well... I've had it since (Troy referred me to it, modtime on module's
files is) Sep 30 2018. And
Remember- the NA28 is a locked module, so all these module bugs are from users
who have paid the publisher for the privilege of reporting such howlers!
It might have been preferable for each volunteer in the CrossWire modules team
to have had a period to test the module for free before it was
24 matches
Mail list logo
