Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Dictionary modules?

My understanding is that osis2mod cannot produce anything other than VerseKey modules. Aren't TEI and OSIS coming together on the issue of dictionary markup, though? Is there a significant difference between TEI and OSIS for dictionaries? --Greg On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:20 AM, David Haslam

Re: [sword-devel] diatheke search type regex and the dot ?

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:15 PM, David Haslam wrote: > Are we sure it's an "off by 2" error and not just an email typo? > I'm not sure of that at all. It was my first guess, but being off by 2 would seem strange to me, as I would expect a "fat finger" error to produce an

Re: [sword-devel] diatheke search type regex and the dot ?

147 = 0223 (octal) 128 = 0200 (octal) 226 = 0340 (octal) So it's off by 2 in the top order byte. Not sure why, but it seems you're expecting decimal but the tool is obviously giving out octal. --Greg On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:02 PM, David Haslam wrote: > Thanks Karl, > >

Re: [sword-devel] SWORDWeb Docker image

t? > > > On March 4, 2017 6:34:56 PM MST, Greg Hellings <greg.helli...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Where is the repository with the Dockerfile? What triggers updates and >> rebuilds of the container? >> >> On Mar 4, 2017 7:05 PM, "Troy A. Griffi

Re: [sword-devel] SWORDWeb Docker image

Where is the repository with the Dockerfile? What triggers updates and rebuilds of the container? On Mar 4, 2017 7:05 PM, "Troy A. Griffitts" wrote: > I've compiled a docker image for SWORDWeb if anyone is interested in > trying it out. If you have docker installed

Re: [sword-devel] diatheke search type regex and the dot ?

$ diatheke -b KJV -s regex -k Abed.nego Verses containing "Abed.nego"-- none (KJV) Once I correct the command to include the -k parameter, I also get no results. --Greg On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:58 PM, David Haslam wrote: > I was under the impression that the

Re: [sword-devel] In Windows command shell, diatheke search is restricted to ASCII for the query key!

My only thought is that Windows doesn't use UTF-8 internally (it uses UTF-16), while Sword assumes and demands UTF-8. Perhaps diatheke just blindly consumes its input as UTF-8, and goes along its merry way? --Greg On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:48 AM, David Haslam wrote: >

Re: [sword-devel] In Windows command shell, diatheke search is restricted to ASCII for the query key!

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > On 03/02/2017 12:17 PM, David Haslam wrote: > > I am assuming that when Karl bundles these with Xiphos, he just uses what's > available and most recent in our SVN. > > I don't build/bundle them. They're whatever Greg

Re: [sword-devel] In Windows command shell, diatheke search is restricted to ASCII for the query key!

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:27 AM, David Haslam wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Windows 7 x64 using ordinary cmd.exe as the command shell. > > Do you think I'd get better results if I called diatheke.exe from inside a > cygwin shell ? > I think that I don't like to think about

Re: [sword-devel] In Windows command shell, diatheke search is restricted to ASCII for the query key!

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > On 03/02/2017 11:14 AM, David Haslam wrote: > > Such a diatheke command works OK in Linux, or so I'm told. > > $ diatheke -b KJV -s regex -k Æneas > Entries containing "Æneas"-- none (KJV) > $ diatheke -b KJV -s

Re: [sword-devel] In Windows command shell, diatheke search is restricted to ASCII for the query key!

Don't use Windows? But in all seriousness, is this in CMD or PowerShell? What version of Windows is this? You very possibly could be running into a limitation of the operating system. --Greg On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:14 AM, David Haslam wrote: > This simply doesn't work

Re: [sword-devel] diatheke search type default ?

The omission of the "-s" attribute does not lead to search behavior but instead to Diatheke trying to open the book/chapter/verse specified by the -k argument. So, it seems safe to say, there is no real concept of a "default" search type. It would make sense to say there is a default if there was

[sword-devel] Subversion

Just something we should be aware of, since we are relying on svn in our services. https://arstechnica.com/security/2017/02/watershed-sha1-collision-just-broke-the-webkit-repository-others-may-follow/ --Greg ___ sword-devel mailing list:

Re: [sword-devel] NASB

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:22 PM, TS wrote: > From what I can tell, a member named Kahunapule Michael Johnson seems to > be able to already create a NASB Sword module. > > This is according to his post here and from last year as well. >

Re: [sword-devel] usfm2osis.py appears to be very broken

You'll have to give more information before anyone can help you out On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Ryan V wrote: > usfm2osis.py appears to be very broken now. I ran it on a number of bibles > and it failed to properly convert all of them. For the World English Bible > it

Re: [sword-devel] GlobalOptionFilter=UTF8GreekAccents and non-Greek modules

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 1:58 AM, David Haslam wrote: > The UTF8GreekAccents filter also fails to remove one particular Greek > diacritic. > > At least, that's the case for how it works within diatheke 4.7 distributed > with Xiphos 4.0.4 > > After the normalization step, it

Re: [sword-devel] Fwd: Re: NASB status

re close. In my mind, the current owner (Greg) simply needs >> to have a list of outstanding items which keep us from satisfying 1-3 >> and push each of them down the road until they are done. >> >> I don't know what those items are. I am just concerned that we meet 1-3 >

Re: [sword-devel] NASB

lieve you'll get much support or encouragement from these parts surrounding Zefania. --Greg > > Thank you for your ongoing support and information. It is indeed very > helpful. > > Blessings, > Matt > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Greg Hellings <greg.helli...@g

Re: [sword-devel] NASB

module is in users' hands. The NASB, however, is not a public domain work. --Greg > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017, 12:15 PM Greg Hellings <greg.helli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Eons ago, Crosswire received permission from Lockman to begin work on an > NSAB module that they could commercially de

Re: [sword-devel] Lucene Complaint

d on the mailing lists that were part of the C port. > > Anyway, I mention it as searching those lists or signing up and asking > questions might give appropriate insight. > > DM > > > On Feb 21, 2017, at 12:25 PM, Greg Hellings <greg.helli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > &g

Re: [sword-devel] Lucene Complaint

If memory serves, that was back in pre-1.0 days. The version currently packaged in Fedora is 1.2.24. --Greg On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > On 02/21/2017 02:54 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > > Xapian is the new default at svn head > > I

Re: [sword-devel] Release Wrapup

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Matt Zabojnik wrote: > I don't mean to derail this in any way. I've previously only had > experience with HTML/PHP/SQL, and I'm now learning Python (in order to > develop a SWORD-related Android app) > > Would it be beneficial to port the whole

Re: [sword-devel] Lucene Complaint

at 11:25 -0600, Greg Hellings wrote: > > > > Is there any whiff of hope that we might be willing to move off of > > depending on CLucene for advanced search support and onto a project > > that has any amount of vitality? > > > > I thought we had? Xa

Re: [sword-devel] Release Wrapup

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Haslam wrote: > Are we any closer to a release of SWORD v1.8 ? > No. I don't think there's been a single commit to the engine since that time. At least, I don't recall seeing any messages float across my desk. > > cf. Troy started

Re: [sword-devel] NASB

Eons ago, Crosswire received permission from Lockman to begin work on an NSAB module that they could commercially deliver to users who paid for it. Many people have tackled the work of performing the conversions from Lockman's internal, proprietary markup to a Sword module. Each one has, for

[sword-devel] Lucene Complaint

I know it's been mentioned and hinted at in the past, but I wanted to - again - lodge a complaint regarding the inertia of CLucene use in the engine. CLucene's last release, and last git commit on SourceForge was in 2013. It has had none of the language-specific updates that Lucene has generated

Re: [sword-devel] anniversaries

My HTTP server is not up right now, and that module was kept under password at all times to avoid it getting into the wrong hands. I still have all the files, but they're not publicly exposed. --Greg On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:16 AM, David Haslam <dfh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Greg

Re: [sword-devel] v11n best match selection tool

I did write a Python script that did this in a very rudimentary fashion. I don't remember if it ended up in the tools repository or if it's just in my personal directory sitting around here. I'm on a plane right now, so it's tough to check. --Greg On Jan 6, 2017 8:40 PM, "Troy A. Griffitts"

Re: [sword-devel] Let's Encrypt certificate for crosswire.org

Could we look into installing a Jenkins instance? This certificate (and several other tasks related to release) would be very nice to automate. It would also help democratize the knowledge of how these tasks are accomplished. I have some amount of experience with Jenkins as administrating and

Re: [sword-devel] #include in xzcomprs.cpp - is this a bug or ?

If memory serves, XZ and BZip2 only made it into 1.7 because I goofed. Working with branches in SVN is such a travesty that it led to a few accidental commits moved from trunk to the release branch despite not being intended as such. This is why I've been reluctant to make further releases on 1.7,

Re: [sword-devel] How can I tell which version of the Sword framework is being used? (e.g. in PocketSword)

There should be a file, include/swversion.h or the like, that will tell you. But PocketSword maintains a dose of patches against the library, if memory serves, so you won't find an exact match with the stated version. But that file should give you the information you're looking for. --Greg On

Re: [sword-devel] Announcing Sword++

And even at that point, no copyright will be violated unless someone attempts to mirror or host format shifted versions of the modules. On Sep 27, 2016 11:37 AM, "Greg Hellings" <greg.helli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Unless and until this fork is unable to read a

Re: [sword-devel] Announcing Sword++

Unless and until this fork is unable to read a Sword module format, this discussion is moot. The distribution had no bearing on the software that does the parsing of the file. On Sep 27, 2016 11:32 AM, "DM Smith" wrote: > > On Sep 27, 2016, at 7:52 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:

Re: [sword-devel] MiTM

https://curl.haxx.se/libcurl/c/CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER.html Is curlhttpt.c used for HTTPS? I don't have the source in front of me, but that name suggests it is only for the raw HTTP connection. --Greg On Sep 18, 2016 12:05 PM, "DM Smith" wrote: > I'll look into it. > > >

Re: [sword-devel] libicui18n.so.48

How did you acquire the versions of libsword.so that you have? What operating system are you running on? How did you acquire the versions of libicu* that you have? Your first email mentioned Mono. I'm unaware of any Mono/.NET support for Sword in general. It looks like the libsword.so you have

Re: [sword-devel] make error

The proper fix is to wrap that #pragma with a conditional guard so it only gets applied on GCC 6. I'm sure there are well-documented GCC preprocessor definitions that can be applied there, but Troy will need to commit the fix to SVN once he finds the appropriate guards that he wants to use.

Re: [sword-devel] make error

This is a new line that Troy just committed over the weekend. It is targeting GCC 6. What version of which compiler are you using? Perhaps that pragma needs to be guarded for GCC 6 specifically. --Greg On Jul 4, 2016 5:11 PM, "Daniel Hughes" wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to

Re: [sword-devel] iOS apps will require secure HTTPS connections by 2017

The library has support for HTTPS transports, now. I added that some time ago. So as long as the repositories you are connecting to with PocketSword support HTTPS, then it should be a trivial task to connect via that mechanism. --Greg On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:08 AM, David Haslam

Re: [sword-devel] we need a release

You would need that patched with the latest from the sword-1-7-x branch. Or wait for a 1.7.5 release. I'm in the middle of moving across the country right now, and don't have access to my regular machine (it's packed in my van). The move is taking much longer than initially planned due to personal

Re: [sword-devel] Help with CzeCEP update (av11n)

Oh, right, I was brain farting back to 3.x. Oops! --Greg On May 21, 2016 2:52 PM, "Karl Kleinpaste" <k...@kleinpaste.org> wrote: > On 05/21/2016 03:49 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: > > Does Xiphos support av11n? I didn't think it does. > > Certainly. It was the major

Re: [sword-devel] Help with CzeCEP update (av11n)

Does Xiphos support av11n? I didn't think it does. --Greg On May 21, 2016 2:47 PM, "Matěj Cepl" wrote: > On 2016-03-10, 14:55 GMT, Matěj Cepl wrote: > >> I’m trying to work out something for modules that are old, > >> having no current maintainer, no prior maintainer available >

Re: [sword-devel] The Bible Tool - missing modules?

My bad, I thought you were implying it was from a non-CrossWire source repository. /space/home/swordweb/webmods/badchars/ukjv.conf That version is the version 1.1 of the conf file. The current version for download is 1.1.1 with the version notes reading "History_1.1.1=Corrected .conf encoding

Re: [sword-devel] The Bible Tool - missing modules?

AFAIK the point of the tool is just to give online access. If repositories outside of the official CrossWire one would like to expose their modules through the study tool, they can stand it up and run it on their own host. --Greg On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:37 AM, David Haslam

Re: [sword-devel] CzeBKR has unusual language code

We should probably standardize within our own repository. --Greg On Apr 23, 2016 7:28 AM, "David Haslam" wrote: > Both are valid - refer to the info panel in > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czech_language > > David > > > > -- > View this message in context: >

Re: [sword-devel] help

Help with what? I don't see any content in your message that wasn't copied from the list digest. On Apr 3, 2016 9:16 PM, "John R" wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:00 PM, > wrote: > >> Send sword-devel mailing list submissions to >>

Re: [sword-devel] Front-ends that can display external web-pages?

Additionally, without navigation tools, it would be a terrible user experience. And really, all apps should disable this as it is a security concern. --Greg On Mar 19, 2016 12:54 PM, "DM Smith" wrote: > No module should use this capability. A module has to work across a

Re: [sword-devel] Front-ends that can display external web-pages?

I have forced both Xiphos and BibleTime to do this by using ThML and including an anchor tag with an external url. On Mar 19, 2016 11:37 AM, "David Haslam" wrote: > This might seem like a peculiar question, but it's not as daft as it seems. > > Are there any front-ends

Re: [sword-devel] git

There are no current or active plans to migrate sword hosting to git, nor any officially supported mirror. On Mar 17, 2016 4:37 PM, "Jaak Ristioja" wrote: > Hello! > > What is the status of moving the Sword code from SVN to some git > repository? > > Is there an up-to-date git

Re: [sword-devel] IMP format for Daily Devotionals?

Structurally it sounds very akin to the idea that has occasionally been asked for, to allow commentaries in a gen-book layout. Within the commentary you might have a nesting such as New Testament - Gospels -- Luke --- Birth of Christ Magnificat - Luke 1:50 The commentary might include

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 11:11 -0500, DM Smith wrote: >> The osis2mod program has changed the … to the milestoned >> version. It shouldn’t do that for type=“colophon”. > > Ok, I have committed support for non-milestoned

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

At this point, I believe that SWORD hands off styling like that to the app to do with CSS (for those apps using HTML output). Does it not? I don't thin it's using or , although I could be wrong. --Greg On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:26 AM, David Haslam wrote: > Something that

Re: [sword-devel] regenerating an editable Personal commentary

Can you just pass an empty file to mod2imp, tell it the versification you want, and create the appropriate conf file? --Greg On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > On 02/03/2016 01:37 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > > Can someone offer the necessary steps >

Re: [sword-devel] Colophons

I strongly agree with Troy. It keeps the markup semantic and the import minimally-transformative. On Jan 31, 2016 2:04 PM, "Troy A. Griffitts" wrote: > Certainly agree we should set these off so as not to be mistaken with > canonical text. I would prefer simply adding

Re: [sword-devel] KJV Update

Let's not assume we can rule out the possibility of Windows 10 being the culprit. It has been known to remove user data and programs without warning with some recent updates. --Greg On Jan 30, 2016 10:13 AM, "David Haslam" wrote: > Looks like the previously installed

Re: [sword-devel] Hosting non-US public domain modules

Aren't all (or almost all) copyrights from before 1940 expired at this point, under US Law? I thought there was a 76 year expiration on those older copyrights. --Greg On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:32 AM, David Haslam wrote: > If anyone in a suitable jurisdiction is

Re: [sword-devel] libsword with GCC 6: multiple errors

Sounds like they need to disable the option that says indentation is an error. --Greg On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Peter Von Kaehne wrote: > I received this email on a different mailing list. It remarks re various > flaws gcc6 will complain about when compiling libsword. >

Re: [sword-devel] 64 bit operating system support?

. --Greg --Greg On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Fred Smith <fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:05:52AM -0600, Greg Hellings wrote: >> Fred, >> >> Please tell me which parts of Xiphos are not provided in EPEL. >> >>

Re: [sword-devel] 64 bit operating system support?

Fred, Please tell me which parts of Xiphos are not provided in EPEL. yum info xiphos-gtk3 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.arvixe.com * epel: fedora-epel.mirror.lstn.net * extras: dallas.tx.mirror.xygenhosting.com * updates:

Re: [sword-devel] av11n for Japanese Anglican Church's apocrypha

I'm not entirely sure what you mean by the format you've given. Do you mean those listed as "differ" don't exist in one or the other side of the comparison? Do you mean the content at that reference is different? --Greg On Jan 15, 2016 8:49 AM, wrote: > Which av11n

Re: [sword-devel] Eighteenth Century Collections Online

I'm not aware of having access, but just a note - I had to track it down online and that title appears to be in the ECCO 2 collection. --Greg On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:56 PM, DM Smith wrote: > Does anyone have access to Eighteenth Century Collections Online at a >

Re: [sword-devel] Contributing to sword-tools repo?

nomy is granted to those projects > wishing to become part of the CrossWire community to be managed how the > project leaders see fit. But the core engine architecture, policies, and > code are not loose. > > I hope that, even if you disagree with my tight management and > submission policy fo

Re: [sword-devel] Contributing to sword-tools repo?

Based on the way this conversation has gone in the past, nearly everyone involved except the project administrator would welcome a migration to git. Even if it was a self-hosted git. But the project admin remained unconvinced the last time the topic came up. So please, don't re-open this old sore

Re: [sword-devel] Contributing to sword-tools repo?

Matej, Yes, I wasn't meaning to target you directly with my response. My comments were meant for newcomers to the thread. --Greg On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Matěj Cepl <mc...@cepl.eu> wrote: > On 2016-01-14, 15:06 GMT, Greg Hellings wrote: >> Based on the way this conver

Re: [sword-devel] Contributing to sword-tools repo?

Matej, On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2016-01-14, 20:12 GMT, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: >> Many projects at CrossWire do have loose to medium submission >> policies: sword-tools, flashcards, swordweb, parts of > > I really have no ax to grind with libsword

Re: [sword-devel] Latest version of libsword?

include/swversion.h:#define SWORD_VERSION_STR "1.7.3" > > J > > On 12.01.2016 00:38, Greg Hellings wrote: > > 1.7.4 is the latest. https://www.crosswire.org/svn/sword/tags/ > > > > Perhaps 1.7.9 was used to mean the head of current svn which will > > be

Re: [sword-devel] Latest version of libsword?

1.7.4 is the latest. https://www.crosswire.org/svn/sword/tags/ Perhaps 1.7.9 was used to mean the head of current svn which will become 1.8 in many years. In which case it probably should have been set as 1.7.999 to fit with previous internal numbering. --Greg On Jan 11, 2016 4:16 PM, "Jaak

Re: [sword-devel] Latest version of libsword?

http://www.crosswire.org/svn/sword/branches/sword-1-7-x/configure.ac 1.7.5 in prep for the next maintenance release. --Greg On Jan 11, 2016 5:08 PM, "Greg Hellings" <greg.helli...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't have commit privileges on all the necessary files on master. >

Re: [sword-devel] Category=Essays ?

Datapaths are always relative to the root of the mods.d folder. By convention, essay data files would be stored in the same place as genbook and would need to follow the same rules. --Greg On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:34 PM, David Haslam wrote: > Thanks DM, > > Is the

Re: [sword-devel] 64 bit operating system support?

SWORD has no requirements on any library, to my knowledge. It has optional, recommended requirements of libcurl and ICU. Both of those support 64-bit. PocketSword's maintainer would have to specifically state whether or not he builds them into 64-bit packages. --Greg On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at

Re: [sword-devel] Detecting bad references?

The specific, short answer to your question is "no". At least, not within the engine. If you're actually checking an OsisID you could read the metadata and create a regex test for each versification. The more nuanced answer is that, when parsing a potential reference the engine will pop up as

Re: [sword-devel] thread-safety in libsword?

The library has no guarantees of multi-threaded safety, so you'll need to handle locking outside of the library. Out of curiosity: what types of simultaneous/multi-threaded calls are you performing? Some things can be parallelized by instantiating multiple instances of SWMgr (e.g. this is how

Re: [sword-devel] NASB status

Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Troy A. Griffitts <scr...@crosswire.org> wrote: > I also have in my mind that the Hebrew and Greek lexicons Lockman includes > with the NASB still had some processing to complete, is that right? > > On January 6, 2016 7:55:57 AM MST, Greg Hellings <g

Re: [sword-devel] NASB status

The software requirement was JSword support - I forget which feature it was that was needed, but Troy didn't want to proceed until JSword/BibleDestktop fully supported the features. --Greg On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > NASB has been a decade-plus

Re: [sword-devel] NASB status

ell and I feel these 3 items are > reasonable requests. > > Troy > > > > On 01/06/2016 11:04 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > > On 01/06/2016 10:56 AM, Greg Hellings wrote: > >> but no one has told me what those issues are > > It comes down to this: >

Re: [sword-devel] Submission of OSIS files for Bibles and Commentaries

If CrossWire is eligible for the same type of free license on Stash and Bamboo that we receive for JIRA, I can help automate this process into requiring only a commit to a Stash repository which automatically initiates the build and deploy of modules. Some nice integration points exist between

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD utility Diatheke

I think the 'canonical="true"' is what's keeping them present. I thought the filters are not supposed to strip out any canonical text, ever. --Greg On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:42 AM, David Haslam wrote: > Although one of the diatheke command line options is -h to include

Re: [sword-devel] HarfBuzz

I believe Pango is in the stack for gtk and, therefore, Xiphos. --Greg On Dec 12, 2015 3:43 PM, "David Haslam" wrote: > Which of the front-ends use Pango? > > Do any front-ends use the SIL Graphite smart font technology? > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphite_%28SIL%29

Re: [sword-devel] Personal commentary vs. deutercanon

Wouldn't it be necessary to generate a new personal conf with Versification=KJVA from the get-go? --Greg On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 12:38 -0500, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: >> A Xiphos user wants to edit Personal for references

Re: [sword-devel] OSIS markup best practice: sanity check

Troy's JNI bindings are specific to Android currently. --Greg On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:10 AM, DM Smith wrote: > I think Troy has a binding to the SWORD library in Java. If it exposes the > same as Peter mentions, you can call out from xslt to Java. We do something >

Re: [sword-devel] Lamsa Bible

Is that even out from copyright yet? --Greg On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:59 PM, SonWon wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I am looking for a copy of the Lamsa Bible to use with my studies. > > "Lamsa produced his own translation of the Bible in the form of The Holy > Bible from Ancient

Re: [sword-devel] BPBible

I believe your assumption is false. --Greg On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:10 PM, jonathon wrote: > All: > > Assuming that BPBible is still an actively developed/maintained front > end, where has the development repository migrated to? > > https://code.google.com/p/bpbible/

Re: [sword-devel] Namespace Proposal re eBible - collissions, duplication, clean-up etc

This is a proposal I've brought up multiple times in the past when people have said it would be difficult to resolve multiple copies with the same name. It would necessitate changes to existing front-ends, but they would not be drastic. However, this only addresses the duplication issue in terms

[sword-devel] Module collisions

So I just added the new eBible repository and I'm seeing a few module name collisions with existing modules that I have installed (and I, by no means, have a large number of them installed - only about two dozen at present). General Books - Pilgrim's Progress Dictionaries - Robinson's,

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

Why is HTTPS not supported? It's supported by the engine and by at least BibleTime and Xiphos AFAIK. --Greg On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson < kahunap...@ebible.org> wrote: > The main repository has been updated with revised modules with Strong's > numbers (5 of them).

Re: [sword-devel] Versification discovery? [Was: Re: French versifications, was Re: FreJND and HebDelitzsch released]

: On 2015-08-23, 21:04 GMT, Greg Hellings wrote: I had submitted a Python script somewhere that simply walks through every Could you elaborate a little bit on that “somewhere” part, please? :) Matěj -- http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mc...@ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB

Re: [sword-devel] Versification discovery? [Was: Re: French versifications, was Re: FreJND and HebDelitzsch released]

or with your changes. --Greg On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Matěj Cepl mc...@cepl.eu wrote: On 2015-08-24, 18:21 GMT, Greg Hellings wrote: Specifically: http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/av11n.py I have found it and start to work on it (it didn’t work out of the box). My

Re: [sword-devel] Versification discovery? [Was: Re: French versifications, was Re: FreJND and HebDelitzsch released]

I had submitted a Python script somewhere that simply walks through every versification in the Sword library and reports the number of extra/missing verses in a given OSIS file relative to each versification with a per-Testament breakdown. For instance it might give output similar to the

Re: [sword-devel] 1.7.5a1

On Aug 21, 2015 9:20 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson kahunap...@ebible.org wrote: On 08/20/2015 06:08 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: Developers and other interested parties, I've created a tarball and an SVN tag for SWORD 1.7.5a1. Please test it and let me know if there are issues. If I hear nothing

Re: [sword-devel] Yet another iteration of the eBible.org repository is in progress.

Alternatively, make sure you update to zText for your drivers instead of RawText if you're now using the compression algorithms (I mention it since your last communications were about getting the zip compression enabled) during generation. And specify the proper compression level as well. All too

[sword-devel] 1.7.5a1

Developers and other interested parties, I've created a tarball and an SVN tag for SWORD 1.7.5a1. Please test it and let me know if there are issues. If I hear nothing or only positive feedback, I'll bless the same tarball as the final 1.7.5 release.

Re: [sword-devel] Yet another iteration of the eBible.org repository is done.

You'll need to install something like zip-devel or libzip-dev or whatever is the appropriate development package for the zip library and then recompile libsword. What platform are you running these tools on? --Greg On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

Matej, Are you certain that you're calling up the xiphos that came from my packages? My biblesync build script never generates a biblesync.so.1.1.2 at all, so there should be no way for the Xiphos package to be created while referencing it. If the biblesync spec file was generating a library file

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

The point is that, if we build against 1.1.2 (the way we used to build against 1.7.1 of SWORD, etc) then we are forced to execute a rebuild of the Xiphos and all other downstream packages just because the filename changes to 1.1.3 later on. Even though 1.1.2 and 1.1.3 are API/ABI compatible. By

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

Drat, I forgot to build the epel RPMs for this build. I'm kicking off the build right now. Looks like biblesync never made it into EPEL-7 either, so I'll push both of them into circulation here in short order, if possible. --Greg On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Fred Smith

Re: [sword-devel] New repository - Implications for frontends

BibleTime thinks it is a feature well-worth adding. It's been present there for a very long time. I use it quite heavily whenever I'm doing Sword install testing because it's very much more convenient than having to scroll all around. --Greg On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 7:48 AM, David Haslam

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository refresh complete

I thought locales.conf was used by the engine internally for understanding abbreviations properly, but that is based on rumor and speculation. --Greg On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:32 AM, David Haslam dfh...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Karl, You must have found it at the same time as I did, before I

Re: [sword-devel] heads up - languages/repo frontend problem

Kahunapule, I'm getting login failures at that FTP account, so I can't test. :( --Greg On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson kahunap...@ebible.org wrote: Yes, it is pretty easy to crash Xiphos, right now. Oops. For testing purposes, the repo under construction is:

Re: [sword-devel] usfm to osis converter...

That path is correct, you'll just need to use your package manager to install Python 3.x instead of the default Python, which is typically still on the 2.7 series. On Aug 4, 2015 8:06 AM, David Haslam dfh...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks Ryan, I imagine some SWORD developers are competent in

Re: [sword-devel] heads up - languages/repo frontend problem

The issue is the top layer of the repository view, which is just languages. Underneath those will be nested the works themselves to arbitrary size. Allocating eight thousand will be sufficient unless a large number of extra languages (a la Klingon, Esperanto, etc) are added. But handling it

Re: [sword-devel] Unified module lists

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Jaak Ristioja j...@ristioja.ee wrote: Use the repository identifier together with the module identifier, if required. Am I correct that what you are currently trying to work around is how Sword stores the modules on disk? Because I don't see any big

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >