> Analysis tools such as *mod2imp* and *diatheke* take the *module
>>name*
>> > as the main command line argument.
>> >
>> > Not the filename of the .bzz files in the .
>> >
>> > i.e. Your command should be given in the context of th
autocorrects.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Back conversion
From: Tom Sullivan
To: sword-devel@crosswire.org
CC:
Thank you for the replies. I got an output using -r OSIS, but it does
not look good or useful.
My goal was to look at the OSIS used, for example
urrent directory.> > Best regards,> > David> > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.> >> ---- Original Message >> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Back conversion>> Local Time: 30 December 2017 7:48 PM>> UTC Time: 30 December 2017 19:48>>
02:58 PM, David Haslam wrote:
>>To pick up on one possible misunderstanding by Tom,
>>Analysis tools such as *mod2imp* and *diatheke* take the *module
>>name* as the main command line argument.
>> Not the filename of the .bzz files in the .
>>
word
path_ as the current directory.
Best regards,
David
Sent with ProtonMail <https://protonmail.com> Secure Email.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Back conversion
Local Time: 30 December 2017 7:48 PM
he context of the _sword path_ as
>> the current directory.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> David
>>
>> Sent with ProtonMail <https://protonmail.com> Secure Email.
>>
>> Original Message
>>> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Back conversion
>>
Email.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Back conversion
Local Time: 30 December 2017 7:48 PM
UTC Time: 30 December 2017 19:48
From: dmsm...@crosswire.org
To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum <sword-devel@crosswire.org>
Not really. The osis2mod process is los
.
Best regards,
David
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Back conversion
> Local Time: 30 December 2017 7:48 PM
> UTC Time: 30 December 2017 19:48
> From: dmsm...@crosswire.org
> To
ed several years ago.
In any case, the way we operate as a Society, there is rarely a need for back
conversion.
Best regards,
David
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> Original Message ----
> Subject: [sword-devel] Back conversion
> Local Time: 30 Dec
Not really. The osis2mod process is lossy (no verse markers) and transformative
(it is in milestoned form). For that reason, we really don’t recommend it.
Also, many OSIS modules are built from non-OSIS source.
mod2imp expects the module to be installed. Beyond that I’m not sure.
mod2osis
Y'all:
Is there a way to convert a module in .bzz format back to OSIS.
I tried mod2imp, but the help message does not say how to input a
module. The name of the module fails, as do .bzz files.
Thanks.
--
Tom Sullivan
i...@beforgiven.info
FAX: 815-301-2835
-
Great News!
11 matches
Mail list logo