We've got a bug report in Xiphos saying that Chinese modules can't be
searched well with CLucene indices.
https://sourceforge.net/p/gnomesword/bugs/488/
I know nothing at all about Chinese, and can't address this. Can anyone
supply some info?
___
SWORD uses an English analyzer (StandardAnalyzer) that works well for Latin-1
languages and for languages that bear some passing similarity to English (e.g.
spaces between words, phonetic spelling, ...), but it does not do well with
others.
The Lucene project has a few Chinese analyzers.
DM Smith dmsm...@crosswire.org writes:
For JSword, we use the language code as supplied in the conf to vector
into the selection of the best analyzer.
OK, well, considering that the regular Sword interface to this is
particularly generic, i.e. module.createSearchFramework(...), providing
no way
Because it is module.createSearchFramework, it has access to the conf and could
vector to the right analyzer. It would be a very small change to the code, but
with big impact.
-- DM
On Oct 7, 2012, at 7:40 PM, Karl Kleinpaste k...@kleinpaste.org wrote:
DM Smith dmsm...@crosswire.org writes:
